JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?BA } _JQYF08Ȧx%:2Z7PL~w_  SȲON3Z)2#VAEhHwj4!GpSrE(w U6MÒ94Wn@;PXm>2Xd dg!q^pGB0@T#dv"t `BsR+{cj*@9T{c Y!5OP!*=qU3U$o,RGlvE ٖh%hČifˬD#Bp2y5.9| Q)bO9=):4w`F) S0m+ֳmU#v88=jSR}fIu/2knnP+Rq\i~a3ώ[ysk者="S'ˎzXZF0Āc#oF>\RRZDWً|åDmB3JsCAcևӐ1kNcEKE&WxcWk`nLldP{bhQxɢoDHqFG20pip<&9ʜ 1i=0"-* ǭh#e>b1X8%Ԥ$1ד{Íb_[oj؅FGzZi$8繫IBPQEwҢ9l5nąAlKc(ng Bg~csX롴pZHEڴa kS8kY"D*Lt1Gݺd#z:U[]&r0kTn K%R1 j,n2ls^4đX=a HGtЬrW@ {*;WFH>Q$nՈ\ %A1Qc;r*t}i$BX~u0@WfnP+9ڀ\QN~C~(FCN.#pAz欦ByAtZvpsji)7(9 ǯ|r 0 Kؑgge;x4;4mPSwD}%?398$N9nD5Mdge ZXS-qޫ΍W=N@:($@u]YuzӁ vƒpmذڝ僜T(zR Ͳ&5#(^}$+A7@`GEs` u|Y3=A+:nexܥ6NQtJCAsxzߺyZЃϡ G# :v.I$go0FWqWQ@JuhdQ@ObON$P":6\Ig#9T~j̙*1LiEJTnCE;cσz&֦Gr""Sy?Zxr Q9sjC#l5o^56#3P2uE$Kip#6qڮkbţ %o#[zPр\ň=| \eU\`o}p v9ҧf Ob" t yq\UwSq1ctsM(8s^*:9h*ظ)*Hkajb]@=A+Yz5 0-߭jE/.;Ss"{VjMʇ0PF7}+bB }*PIJ!33N0H *j%[$xEf^abS݁iwDVPNT:Î 2^COF»D/h=遻ƛG4&k! j c<ѝ$=-Dli,[gE.bsh0rEli-%7.9Y,;QβMM8zΛ3PI;tD&icxy.upWv2)` 'c]dΤ.㶳c&5Aʐ֩Ȍ;rcj21,H"[2WH[dv1T^5Gy94,JUW ֊ ;oZõHe!$c.6އ zJ2[wDrQꊰT Mi-b#'C\Ҳ&SWv*8F *E98lwB6"*R6zqH+ޕ?ZDa8HĆ1>OcT E0yEHF=W:TYzbc82矖9>*hH?Q@R.CpqhjDPCqޫF\TDY##i<)ާF=*]q׽&I#k meMV4kXc]GuR>=놲竆~$cr Z]0ytj[*$U;C92?ZdRjE%OE@ GZ((#=Jq9]`0RtqT1鎦idLMIe#EF[^SP2NIFʹ ǩܛ6PHmF9-P#, qV#If/N=Wz׬OlRTWFģ  kzV21ƭl ּyu^}d26ݥ\w{PfA|%ޱ;ӫG*_>\jLxA]dRY#Lj3: M]3wmI44Y4B\S]0;pΫw"[` f<榎3 S2$iU\bƊ{uSqȦ8S8LGRO5m@Ub$Fx13ހ,lF߆#j1L 80?J@{4k$l :VAClZFry]h4DW%T$¼v~^׊!Zxq6"CkyeJf=K"kC^qh_H=~4wv(TZ-bg%i}8#ֵ[=T$9;UTa:`m;ţr ㎕c*GKXH F2"si.)Sqx6d\LW*zks%j!HZr௮)WBNn*!)WSQÍ zr8*ls&E#dj>5LR2*11AҀ JU   7Ҁ#v>1?cA)UC)S< 5eu#P}Z%9Uf`֯a۷t>Ԏ)o zҰ kar$׫xsUg.cSj52G*RJ$jB;?*^E7;Hv{ghu&$c5^ ү. FWV4MS)UY׸֓nshfBƃ`LPF TbrWBX 09 XIvYI7/8JR9V"sP)s7߇/&I+/x>я)2HkKgT18 *qGb; G;xy(Ijw*u#zSq19z㊎g;HZUG)3`ǻ6s]^|HJ [˱w$WU|f'N\n QEZ2d@1P (g$jQ4QCj!\w[gQE dEPIave chosen not to label them to avoid confusion.&nbsp;</P> <P>Standard periodization typically uses a year long Macrocycle which includes maintaining in-season and culminating in a single peak performance. BFS has used, for over 15 years, a yearly cycle divided into in-season and off-season periods which are further divided into 4-week cycles. Within these 4-week cycles are four different weeks which one could call Mesocycles. Dr. Stone has stated, "Periodization models depend on the training level of an athlete. The less trained athlete's periodization model can be less complex." This is what we have done with the BFS program for both junior high and high school athlete.&nbsp;</P> <P>I have always had two problems with a standard periodization model espoused by Dr. Stone for team sports. First, the maintaining in-season cycle is absolutely foolish in high school sports. What about the three-sport athlete? Are you going to maintain him/her all year long? I also submit that you should not maintain college football players in-season who are red-shirting or those who are not on the top two teams offensively or defensively. Why should a guy sitting on the bench maintain? Why not maximize his potential and build for the future? This is also our concept with the Utah Jazz.&nbsp;</P> <P>The Russian/East European periodization model was usually meant for individual athletes peaking for a specific event like the European or World Championships. When do you peak in football? Is it game #5 or #10? If you lose #5, you might not have any post-season games. In football every game is important. Dr. Stone, too, has wrestled with this problem. Our BFS attainable goal is to continually get stronger throughout the season. We are always stronger as a team at the end of the season than at the beginning. I feel this has its advantages come play-off time.&nbsp;</P> <P>As Dr. Stone finished his first hour of his periodization discussion, he made a statement which shocked me. The discussion centered around seasonal sports like football. Dr. Stone stated, "So a typical periodization program may not work." The Standard periodization model must have adjustments made if it is to help athletes in team sports reach their potential. I have thought about these adjustments and implemented them with tens of thousands of athletes over the last 15 years. It is now fool-proof. I'm not saying it is the only way to adjust a Standard periodization model for team school sports. However, I do want you, the reader, to know I have not seen anything come close to the BFS system for multi-sport athletes in a high school environment over a one year or career span of time.&nbsp;</P> <P>I believe standard periodization models can be great for mature college athletes engaged in an individual sport such as track. With a few adjustments, it should also be great for athletes who are starters in a team sport like football. Adjustments and fine tuning is the "art" of coaching.&nbsp;</P> <P>The second half of Dr. Stone's presentation was centered on the results of research studies on periodization. This was quite frustrating. The studies were those which showed periodization was better than systems using 3 sets of 6 reps, 5 sets of 6, or one set to failure. Well of course it is. Anytime you vary your workout you are going to have better results than if you do the same thing day after day and week after week. I present this in a form of a question at BFS Clinics. Every time, every kid says that variation is better. I guess that was what was so frustrating. Why do research on something everyone knows? I want to see research done on different adjustment possiblities within periodization. Dr. Stone answered, "There is still a lot of people that don't know variation is best. That's why I presented those particular studies." The studies presented were fine and interesting but we in 1996 shou