JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================LK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?j(+hZYR5pgkEc*|g=W8+Y/^Ģ}>p;OPx݆j64ʾsC Sny0cu+j[9<~BOiq=5g"F?y1@C=ZK톧sOolKypa]6KslٌZ&_)+Y&YlFzۊؐx/wL=Mew bRhNJ݆h2O4XfT7dKy*Kyh9 #Ln4p.[pb=#]mŅW{؄숑Oj7(wQ@?hG8+>]6w8%}ۑ$6q; oai#Njyk=j5,BN[WID+d/O1TtNI9-R:~5ޙt~̪P`'^*m ߛ(LSН-\?PԭVki7[:g+)m2&tNעE]F9mhe댏μ-Fxgܮ碱UZ7t\"+%Jd_R8v_\TLɵ|[%ߚGkM[CCehJp^P)M-,,fVxBnsw:E-r?L0 Je2ǦxN9xܴ͹[񶒚vi*4plۚt˿א[1$8үu[5쭞e;ENMtw9Ṱnj.gJ!hetޟOyҾ 6ݖoch0ZmpWrJP} r/95cӴc+mhSA^_iڽ-1Bc ֈdzX{?gMgdǩxOν^u0jzl#45pG,f w0b9\=qӵl[+,s0f@> ]j\^M*( xAWC^ŧ̆ e ĀI'ydFE/"pݾEӗ?A\b=غ)G&W8$GZnm4I"ɳ hBf֯*āW0=k"IRPD]*+d;\÷ֽPGF1;V1xy>aidMa#vE1Q@V$`g$uk>4 ,gb;` A=FsrN 0\$栭Lѯi\sP:lc☺w XIq?,="=zԉa<֌'+*W`n$#bKGH.nm;E8eZe *T\/uQg~bwnp+zaB22@%}:{xCI#n{ujKO),Yݎq™FPFM+ZGn}kN(W=M.֑*[ey*1O֭H>PNJhe Body Fat?<br><br>There are seven different methods to measure body fat. Hydrostatic or underwater weighing is one popular method which is considered accurate. The problem with this method is the cost. It certainly is not practical for high schools or most colleges. Other disadvantages of this system is the hassle of stripping down and submerging yourself in a tank. It is also difficult to administer and takes about 10 minutes to test.<br><br>DEXA is another accurate way to test body fat. I had this done on myself to compare the DEXA results with the hydrostatic method and the new Tanita Analyzer. All three were essentially the same. DEXA s systemuses x-rays and is extremely expensive.<br><br>Skin calipers are the most popular method because of the cost. They are inexpensive but not very accurate. Another problem is the difficulty of reproducing results. In other words, there