JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================lK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?( (N*FqwQOx]Yx3NM%T((TFw '5,ǀ5gAX<ԓ!@9ʶ֧meƺ)m$܏) @H {+  G^~)3%Temqڬx'@k"[P ұAJ3DyE)C\-VV? ҅r\R$񷇬IO8Sc߆pjV>8#`*'^;etĆXm*iJ79JZPF(0TWᴲ0r`Z C$K ~fH=8V2441+G k3I*uhp"'#R5ye1$SsFzZ=֙#@`.>o(+ޥ)%lnHw@q߁\#k0I!3qxKޭq#S)Xc|׾j ]6Oe$ qǯ=1Pr#I$͜WaX7wV$-5>Y0&hJҳ$)cr63Pf#&L)ă~ubBjMX./^?$_)0OzOj Pr޹-?R:pO>9[^[\$#] 03c=>˨vcKus? Zkdl cj~5JyªIUJϣwwq<Ý۰oR/Q c6³b\"$HIY… I*`Ry,$}}+Ӽ HtYFO&=Zvpip@m\c};+ $yLjM:]6%cXxN-Dmı&q\1HTU:[󋋳 %T'3Z:>c|tF8zVvf9 ;0*ʃxՐcl9^?VqyjHLg\ ]<_MkC^O-J Xs]7ķQL²O@O$ZRrMtӥ M3-iTwvKM溢0.p-u[X'=3\Q O~k~/cDC*7)$iF ,Xgs;-c6iZPȼgx*VWGPs]ʌT$ZR_ח2akGJyw)= =W=YT=v #`?Z`v54i}9/kOC<) c[+ MD5ҩ6 cuK)m)@ f^(u<. cיK{gx[FqȡzYQ3 cqPKԏ|?'9or[]>\3Vx{-6D4[āc]n8끞x:^AgG).[<br>DEXA is another accurate way to test body fat. I had this done on myself to compare the DEXA results with the hydrostatic method and the new Tanita Analyzer. All three were essentially the same. DEXA s system uses x-rays and is extremely expensive.<br><br>Skin calipers are the most popular method because of the cost. They are inexpensive but not very accurate. Another problem is the difficulty of reproducing results. In other words, there can be a wide variance of results between testers or even the same tester.<br><br>Ultrasonic systems are accurate and priced right but there is some burden to the subject and moderately difficult to operate. Also, testing cannot be done in under a minute like the new Tanita Scales. The IRI or infrared method has a lower price but has an accuracy problem. BIA or Bio-electric