JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================cK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?~ۊ8UaZ6BESD.uFOҨG9ap۞0rcgIapMr9<7w}k `XC=ʱ[luSö#B_*6C?@zչbHrp2q^Srp6W(]mX)?$c ^1QU0ܚ:-t-Umsڪ~k߯LJw&Ƽ++:XZ#2^)Y,jln3H>?}Jq(V*a1ܼ2Ka֭֜͝ n֖h#g*1o[K Q@!U.{{n4 $N*ϧ_%Ģ%b+A^+w&ܱ=I);ulONI,muIa^e{Akgi X8>ZҲ,W9Ib ZjG-Z4<+fh35i4\B]9ĩ# þ? >nhK}#d3  ]G $`r9:¥B(ug=B|&Q2Jwn­ukkt2p>qV5ZY"UkbQetڭuRӿYٯ֤x:6#Te%@-gf~Aoe2XU'mFUU-fiE%%+˨[+yd ؼpމ;iUN{kI`vX" gV|aIw?}υ5R.Z'HA$gŎmGB"k[_c*cZn֍L̜S|:ľ$R`up~jzw&GW:5 (yJx،t^{wuė,%!D'өhءbIQݵ.X)w3zvq!1ϫgl?~uo}I*c6r\~|GᛝZAv&F݉"[= Ah-}3׈Z`ʳˏu ͵ o;F=-k1ye 9tOh`ӥ)deO 3iP[OOԆ(gȋN,,3n%dY02kƅ[" dǨ1Wܿ3&&6DN:6l;RH 7\8<':KȍpH yegUU>sŽ3^ҭ#>ZrsU6I'tT:WLJ+h:z;=fA#JS8)k5+g.XPۿSO%pPj+ѕ:\J"5Z} yOy\BEGo_GӞ=Riܳ@8vƽo1[kuȎG=+*i+4̳qQ1tĒJ##?d\ֺᕵĂaȅ~>+g2t+.<=4  V% /]B`pU+aw j5À7T 6=-8+]X}Z^,A'OY<br>DEXA is another accurate way to test body fat. I had this done on myself to compare the DEXA results with the hydrostatic method and the new Tanita Analyzer. All three were essentially the same. DEXA s system uses x-rays and is extremely expensive.<br><br>Skin calipers are the most popular method because of the cost. They are inexpensive but not very accurate. Another problem is the difficulty of reproducing results. In other words, there can be a wide variance of results between testers or even the same tester.<br><br>Ultrasonic systems are accurate and priced right but there is some burden to the subject and moderately difficult to operate. Also, testing cannot be done in under a minute like the new Tanita Scales. The IRI or infrared method has a lower price but has an accuracy problem. BIA or Bio-electrical Impedance Analysis is accurate but has a medium price and cannot be tested in under a minute.<br><br>The Tanita Analyzer uses the BIA process which sends a mild electrical current through the body t