JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================K" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?u S\.qeo vKr^xBIrZ/ ʯtq0kWTN=h/ _W_G_ZGa}nV06ېO8 :ߥw,!3&eXdc\<A{MX@JK`H#G ڛmNku8k"xSIrA=* &gZrKpcn)k׈;tm0*ݰ$W:7Ռ(Zkhͻ#;0}t3+Z)W4AO]k>\ncl _CCO}.oۄx?ҭi->I &RY1=s@^ 壒A#\÷AUݬe?eĖ̀*Jv? ]k(ؐ:4oh$i&bb4_ h4Dhw 26 VYXq '6x\X :~`;Y׈|3mZĪ\Ef?VbNr{jί M_H{}cMxbg3 w4c#^Jc ixn{WtrxVx8<޳[/5IY= A Ρ{[dgߨnq#8jx߇Q<@!F T0<"/Ajׅjnd!~vSܜMuӿ/Po'7DboCcZZ=ލid 2lFAB$Ju~j4 e[]E@2~cԚ{M6\][*(vy$pvVLVC1<Ӹ#V۾1,rH23͗{;^5Uǯz;].qZխNhT|Qu ǃɲemӰqޯhǴZI~& A Z\,1+&>wpEhkF[m-܄}UuFN,D@ TzU g۞aʮa 8_h>ki q 35j{$gk+C`eU\f#Y> Dಂ9VCt*G i~ ݤ2wnUČ9{ ֶ=xD[i$eTd^O.huS@tsYu{Ď0p O8?g2<sM4?בb`rqڵt5mq/DgxIőDY  ͟9溍@:{Gk8)VNt?EsOg-+9n[p5t[?_EsZ΁vAwDx]kL[gx +CZ[ET4iZtVp:cG |Vc?i"D_銢T+l0a~t]v]REXA&6袀4A^dTVSm&?[0ޓtQ@-3zue-3-8sO6Zm`2c8g|$!9湩.'(v{f:l^'{}[v}Cأ$"կowga@}I\J[H|r3ԚF9a 1<M6]M9#+>h^HiE!^:_֊8X4hZ77UqHkUV#a|цn{|[tol![V9>c/`֭,5]˜`d), `1L'XZfrKN? .$חV)H`⳩>fcec|4Z$?\M:Cj NOL~ڸϵJ䓜=kJCN^7w>F9# &դDi sh)ug+7K 9f$jykͪ,K'㰬>VszT=e$\o턌ٽGoƊİJBiaNY-4] ̼xFD{i> el.=1a)J̥-,`x:[[O]Bx8+ZU'.cr|Arڴq WL4Hdg VyCZm$VHu JO(!CsjlxtJѹ^SSe&HA3OELC( F[Ғjorj[bAEB#AJiZTP=jg7ʐM2qvtgsF 4=6+,HNI+ag!6#㚂Id4BMDEbi4rZisJ~dA9NԬLN瓃Ek[cfnUddqU(R㼳H 0BrWW ?ʤ_u\pSTڱ"ɧkIy6V:I "ungϜ9jթa!aڴcQMnz ,9 'Z9. =Ҵ>)_)^ O:ɖI09=yi-He8mgA.UT|QiH;G$ Gs(a/V+$[{r>)Z! Tf:O'VȂ*BK(ɥ$9ʡ^ij#ܰb_Q9$zC ɏ-ԅOE)I\A %YD@4# sZ}?T).bEoF0O`1EPg(s|>bOE:fc#ű "O9Zٔs"ƽĿ^3I<BH3Pj9OPQI)f}E:SD>֊x?d any objectionable comments from school patrons.<br><br>And the Court Says...<br><br>In 1995 the Supreme Court ruled that drug testing student athletes was legal. The case name was Veronia School District vs. Acton. An official investigation led to the discovery that the high school athletes of Veronia School District participated in the use of illegal drugs. School officials were concerned that drug use increased the risk of sports related injury. The school district adopted a student athlete drug testing policy which authorized random urinalysis drug testing of its student athletes. James Acton, a student, was denied participation in his high school football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.<br><br>The constitutional question was:  Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy inte