JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================pK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?$_ ㎽*ٔO㦨y\/Ր~όgԚVevRpqjT첶>[sW WVV.c1VDׯS2aҲ.57G)n*d&F*̤" hrG5G˾9֪ ӭQ40<Qn)냂>;?"Fy56֝tuc*VŖIcKԏqu%ڗY::#+l9d!\6p!pw@BF$ȣj=Io=OsU=gJo?^\ĭb]H{T>tvLлKX% |J6d/ uIwI4@Fz1-%R8ٜFϙ ؤ3Ȫ\ڬF.y2Hh )yJ&g,"?V<$-Elw !M ]'Ė[ƒG&7.v[S#Qh`G>ֱ [(39e$umGSV"PW9oDz$ ؓG=KƢHx*&}x06a٠=URTN/\W_氵v5\+(^>Z 7nST\ ~kaԙ*+P7Hb0I-Glme5FMI.C< o;@=@DE8&fǭMuMl[ IK/|¿@4i8^}O>TBVr2Q2}xB[94~Rgޘ%L70qUpNJ( 2I|qH]) #&?Q:܌ @>@jd>F-~5HL SIu_8Kq>#c ^OlR82WvAG*" }{Ba((ウkc?0qz˞y`PdkKM58w,4N5*rAEΧ:G%6 E+$NһziZe@ޮW<ޅY`! j0˱x Z㏴?W2$'k[ .-FA}yrr]PtIKg^U;\z1Ylgm֊ ܨh1kau;rr39C?io=(FhCM=+q.^iQXTe[m-P?tE3CvR{AK^og bO)؈0SW13JoA,;Zd>Һ3C$@?Z(iNLg4qѦ:꭭`Gm q 訠Ҋ*&(( (hr squat stations and four bench stations with a system of rotating from one to another you can run into challenges. Your athletes doing the bench get done with their sets before the athletes who are squatting. What do you do? Well, they could stretch, do a burnout set or do an auxiliary lift. So it does not need to be unproductive or a waste. However, with the one station-do it all concept, there is more efficiency. Your coaching becomes easier because everyone is doing the same lift. Your time management becomes more precise and controlled. The athletes could get more intense if a competitive atmosphere were created with everyone doing the same lift. Finally, in most cases, the one station approach can save space.<br><br>What are the disadvantages, if any? I can think of only two. First, the cost. The transition from one approach to this approa