JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================tK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?Zucͭĝ~V+Y)k\66ue}[V6+`s5 )a`5W PFqV4(I9>BWntJ^*ÛW*ffx#Գ|<d;](l5ΑhJU?2,$qWy\ìihtrmc/Kv2įyIu 1FhȭNcȯ(E]-$&)suj@\=@.7~]k+FB"Npwutm[ ;e=FzU;4~dOW78jYvTo9_1.6b0[ҵRlm3_Bn *ӜVbR8 7x ֬cڝ5'gM, /ZyhQn^K; ? ⁁&%Q M `{ cǥvO/!ޫ!R眊/vnn,KEx 9oJ[$@F<\c?J0C&ބzݟՄ9POR3Y2A;~5.ìiP^gnk&QLSK` b 0ኵg3HUA=z&;Nb 9OAZ(_rWwdr5b<1>y<חxK7dF;WEO īkEmܛK|\*cRWўxO| BN28?t+yjLfNJԨ6xed1bf0T@ 7~i :W|7Yfj3,^Y9`>匼G )4Te}EAR=$׏١1;/caX^񶵤bA4N RnGygsI?SEr[3LӊNDd0H$)Q TwΜ});=<R 損.0i,8!yqO8+Ky\aSC`8$u-!99&#(h!M)EAKE4TgQLfzE"I+XxRĀw}㔥ORӢ?٤>ߞxEX1fa ر>U75([}>$[}zՔ[&Ȩ'Ld#`&p;TwLj t* 03ZmUrH<ִtcVV{iF]b+i]>s$f^h01aҫ)mBbyJ=08nv5/M&g[Pw\hיt9N+]W%;*cw%Ʃ]*XJS䎃Jm3OSm:jڠ^;ɽ iZq^#'|O#Mm G +r3Px Zm2 H#54qHIsd˫EcqR+sFWs$-D[ EbxsCn ) ׫Df8zY mҚJ’\ǔ_x>haxE%\xak!Qr8הzΒ$ZQoZM&=/1D;~U*@E2d] NʡkOsgE]@>ky-=袀$}i8LYΫӆE3 }NIzMgV$lz(e#ainly is not practical for high schools or most colleges. Other disadvantages of this system is the hassle of stripping down and submerging yourself in a tank. It is also difficult to administer and takes about 10 minutes to test.<br><br>DEXA is another accurate way to test body fat. I had this done on myself to compare the DEXA results with the hydrostatic method and the new Tanita Analyzer. All three were essentially the same. DEXA s system uses x-rays and is extremely expensive.<br><vc1G@Zn!2xrՇz汬Lý$-؝++Qs#ȽYag7 n4oe%2ndt