JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================tK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?Zucͭĝ~V+Y)k\66ue}[V6+`s5 )a`5W PFqV4(I9>BWntJ^*ÛW*ffx#Գ|<d;](l5ΑhJU?2,$qWy\ìihtrmc/Kv2įyIu 1FhȭNcȯ(E]-$&)suj@\=@.7~]k+FB"Npwutm[ ;e=FzU;4~dOW78jYvTo9_1.6b0[ҵRlm3_Bn *ӜVbR8 7x ֬cڝ5'gM, /ZyhQn^K; ? ⁁&%Q M `{ cǥvO/!ޫ!R眊/vnn,KEx 9oJ[$@F<\c?J0C&ބzݟՄ9POR3Y2A;~5.ìiP^gnk&QLSK` b 0ኵg3HUA=z&;Nb 9OAZ(_rWwdr5b<1>y<חxK7dF;WEO īkEmܛK|\*cRWўxO| BN28?t+yjLfNJԨ6xed1bf0T@ 7~i :W|7Yfj3,^Y9`>匼G )4Te}EAR=$׏١1;/caX^񶵤bA4N RnGygsI?SEr[3LӊNDd0H$)Q TwΜ});=<R 損.0i,8!yqO8+Ky\aSC`8$u-!99&#(h!M)EAKE4TgQLfzE"I+XxRĀw}㔥ORӢ?p:cֆƹ;<-KkIU.n'ѥ[x22vZM?PԠ)9 kSHi ۆ3׌n:-d)0x܇ҳ.L ױ'5:?4M^_I+HQ(eI qtfM4xݜu-O}F/uۻY%XT`oq4q*&ΚVô\}Џ7N(Cޭl<=F:.)w7|—m}Ė 4XWF q^m{re12Jluw)awI]5 ]M=D9CLz}8Mj\;[V? v1;5a ^}ifpY0dt$v8Towq}ё={U)Ջ}"eA27F%88)>OoKВZV]Ѣۚ.X@olS` ^ģzzHc{ت+6؏7"TTXEy e*p=IݓہUHlj$oFmfę3lΝQL_5ե;Ղ1M-5 O5l/k[& w:e#( jN-=jՙOÏ_BQb :+n4ӊ&~S朻3 the cost. It certainly is not practical for high schools or most colleges. Other disadvantages of this system is the hassle of stripping down and submerging yourself in a tank. It is also difficult to administer and takes about 10 minutes to test.<br><br>DEXA is another accurate way to test body fat. I had this done on myself to compare the DEXA results with the hydrostatic method and the new Tanita Analyzer. All three were essentially the same. DEXA s system uses x-rays and is extremely expensive.<br><br>Skin calipers are the most popular method because of th