JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?AҨZ0E)PE1EJ1FMJ:Q`Rf(Q@M4Ґz:Si AjP?Tf RH(R7Zp#EZSBӈTsO=SRS(q&9TE&) 8 J@SHi aRgނ)2TzU3LSKku˱{Wm40$eⱝxAٖڤU-=GY&/L`FUa. SWD.;|vr<pI[j$=j{`1 =)J*'9(^x+a`o\qk*[#! vᄦb61gL!#Nsөܾ`KVSG,(rHW~ӱ3S /* {Shg>"~* /Vhcف?Aʷ~OJBPZ4ف zQJ.X'4l8v8q[Vq7pQgGU ]ƽ8k`k5b7$W5J-˖VD8ԡa`D`GCT[o2G\0@v3Ƶ4; >"+2}hօٵ\4/u2`쥁1Tl둱 p}XE{GfMҋqg<;}b\ V#Ҥ?4ҖoAWA΋zrjg59bN6bZ؅@$⡾Õ9#m"yc䈸)̤c 0zgd<z҉МWmvTB1'c>1^hw+.}h(8? FhUY$d8__󊥥XIv9`zu6'0I [)um$b%9#$C;;" ݭ GL uiRq~Z9 vv|=]7ֹϘ}3ַb  ݒx^)HثR;]nveI95L6vu;џc βtuOVGIv$$r:u-ɯ>]nqGMK'-G=e]}mE1rynzVܓa[X ;=3QgEU~8H&EԮ؆BuI5_YܾX@ʣ'qT#WCmA8j[z#FEW\.EUM~2Ų8}ݭTG\QI)[=VAt:FVe.| p -.yxHzѠ횷 $ovcx&mAB\0^kڔ q3[9>Yǭo cb.c"]0jOi Gj|˹n}kZM.s&3üg%n^ 2:YUJ&~.DDWhgmR}di7QHӶ|tvkqn4ip}ku$)T;u,U]ۃLzUk,nD<ҹO1]C$r)$RxK$-,$NUېi./L2[z~kl*I5kͨ^S[:4W1^'_+a;]Zō8kx|#S)D¼9gcl6$qI/5DL=yE|d]|J;8/bepx {dZ"Z }x+MXcRT15-;O]@4EY}};sEL,8#Xa`3{VMަke?]pSg9xV}L%̈́Qɜ08錚+44$m9l{µ y׌]5 n5YnN;d{k+M:m! ~xP徧"yK6u՛(*ŁqSOz4u"\]Z0z{[iﶷU wqqwqm V0WғI=Bk'RhȸAu.ʯZXŒq^IϤB(dHEa,az#isӠp ֓ftB^՚[63^XazWf iPrco*4[U6P~^qgcRFk9?*&EvKyr}Cţ,3Tmb@g+$gTf۰p϶*$% O@RDt(c h:vV0F8>Tzz5vԛut620V?k85‹X픮5fuWcRhzlP6. ʬpVOoZJrpds]6O7%I=?WkmpPzSfPdeG!xt❤WuKCzy?(]cCVӾ 9 =OๆBWRٱA&rGj)%Slm`iZBĞkKT.,Ǯ)bS\ĿO^Ag'' jM+$s+I)LkΚCst YO#KqI5=:x-m1GzW}J.e}'ms+- >iEY.t{Yi]>bN~Z7mT8'Afdy5Rh$a3WJZ9V?֡ Uk8^Rݝ\%C.5kmFKt˹TZ6WB).@*U;cD+{<ܭvlCL'^<Δbs7IAUk3皏V3eR :42l*t{D.k֗$VO۟ƲLdgx -5jIKֱǁ5>\eskGIA ՟8,y5_[->-5U\.I)K] m3\c?D\"Ud%unqr^Dtl ԿH2m̛NlRF"mUFnmԜ ~Ƒx%۟J!CW W-Y_ H$? \ȳNjSrqTUE;bm||Ҥ{p}דuk[=#5ftZ^ҔV;&?J*](6G/4w~fè5!s@_XT] \ w7Hlp&LWG}r ?FὉq\xI9ue1ijO'T<@5_犻^%ψ3FF[NV< n. t=υlAɏ5jW-K5{Efe\Lq6Quh}͈K{6 FzAoIS%G,Y@3 ֭uGv(?"gu#)8U%`P^bC;)KmP\88C/N?3~4歯#RzΫ5C٧.x |3 %@3s0H9ѯt0oh9|URq; ˧9?9?`:T, J+)1zYT'8Ebmx1 t-Yg澇GONx~;lݫob}8Ƨ=*@ή@8})<5NX}bwR2 Vx8ôgcW.c#<_VXܸy`xk' 9J V>OaA=Hn0IUva4 #t{)z1h>5/ɶ62|w~WM8&y4DN,3 R>̌y "'*ZI._ؚxH5I050W=m眷5kbјFJ/&1h/a"b$AfE It has never been shown scientifically or clinically that the periodic imposition of large forces by weight training on the growing body causes damage to the epiphysial plates, says Siff, in his book Facts and Fallacies of Fitness.  It is extremely misleading to focus on the alleged risks of weight training on children when biomechanical research shows that simple daily activities such as running, jumping, striking or catching can impose far greater forces on the musculoskeletal system than very heavy weight training. <br>To illustrate his point, Siff compared the stress of squatting with running.  Suppose that one child runs a few hundred meters a day in some sporting or recreational activities. This can easily involve several thousand foot strikes in which the reaction force imposed on the body can easily exceed 4 times bodyweight with every stride. Now let another child do a typical average weight training session with 3-5 sets of squats (say, with 10 reps, 8, 6 and 4 reps), with bodyweight or more for the last set. That bodyweight is divided between the two legs, so that, even taking acceleration into account, the loading per leg is bodyweight or a little more, while the spine is subjected to the full load on the bar. In other words, the legs and spine in controlled squatting are exposed to significantly less force than in running and jumping. Normally, exercises such as squatting will be done no more than twice a week for a total of about 60 repetitions, while the running child will run every day and subject the body to those many thousands of impulsive foot strikes. <br> It does not require much scientific knowledge or computational genius to see that the cumulative loading imposed by simple running activities on the lower extremities and the spine is far greater than the cumulative load of two or three times a week of weight training. Does this now mean that we are justified in recommending that children not be allowed to run, jump, throw or catch because biomechanical research definitely shows that such activities can produce very large forces on many parts of the growing body? <br>It should be obvious then that there is nothing wrong with running and other normal activities of childhood, and therefore no reason to disallow activities of less1