JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================mK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?pqJqN"`61Ki)@9)搭 #l␎*Fx2M]?R4-OR{V&66 BZ7wٻ 맖ɬg&FP8?#yMi%E<Һc.zV6_'f\o$zVf5@IZM6GݜmzN2ujmșTA K}XkCn?l˨i ە= Rtґo3F z a-u{Pi=3Cp01ReTAPsN6tvv\:T"ndZe +Iu#0M Ϯ߅z=\j15O ciRsM6P7_ʗ5.-^dZĈ:c*aFDkϵ3f َ{_GӚι,uF}*٠PC~ZҭNLƥ4med to peer pressure since had he not participated in the jumps he would have been humiliated.<br> The boy s representatives hired as their expert witness a chairperson in the physical education department of a prestigious Division I football school and a leader in several national physical education organizations. He backed up the plaintiff s claim that plyo boxes should not be used, that 19-inch boxes were too high and that the boy was a victim of peer pressure. <br> About a year after the accident, the case made it to court. The plaintiff s  expert witness ended up being discredited when it was discovered that he had never coached a plyometric box jump workout and had never seen one in person or on video. Furthermore, the jury got to see the BFS plyometric video in which untrained eighth-grade boys jump on top of a 32-inch box. The jury also saw our women s video featuring a 13-year-old girl leapfrogging over our BFS 20-inch boxes with ease. Therefore, most of the plaintiff s original arguments were no longer valid. However, this attorney was very sharp and kept stressing the fact that the school should not have been using homemade boxes; he conjectured that the extra width and length of the school s boxes were largely responsible for the injury.<br> At the conclusion of the tr