JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?\qW#|U#ֆm ]fԹ#a.4M-6K܏X^I`-׽gsUVP{ys \RHYAI;uX#! &HOu(0AR0IJqƀE-P0=(P"1LUe`i@X/jMTNh~hi1I0$'y}zl 9#H3PO4޴)\vcOl\.[QZNnc#ޗ)niI#|g_ưOEͮ;>+h$ ;rӁRMPޓs%b@Dd0;Xz]8s;# t ӣ`0IpzNyQ:ȸ !$(Ҫ23Q⊳0(FhaB9x<:!N2qPkV>Tlmi[DIH~`8'ҟ7u|u$Uk\H^yar16 է5cnD̩܅X :x ox^5;h5|SDVs$g1i@p=,UizIZBQv<.sC>t^ g13$`|*iưa,b2)~k:E]˦G {~^sI6Mrڮ/ZIъ2`e3YVo Fs}uwGD D=N=Iz=XRڒVi+޵^P-+Uӹ&5H:Be2/σzV/gƻC{W+@xWP8jY0}6BYH죠Oy(zJ& 7NᐘSq樍ŀ ;@[ܸ/H&mDtӑ^u}_N߼ 4rlԬC* 0Ew O,0<'2G#Տ [o87fGҏj:R@ ARG~t/ˬ}Wo*##xɄײȨ´5I?C<8=(z + &G- `Y+6Z1rvE} i/VD|(=RtRxj4]}@>U?γ5:kْvCްU#o*2QG1VR5s PF6%|ŽnU_ $}שxkOLqqVoF35im)CZ֥&\^Jy^㛹n,]A ^y;~8"#+ަV{ R71s(8ڽ`TҞ7|goqE'!!Al!vh 6q>rCᑝL jzMaˌ`sȬZͲ[) [YH듑]7SMr !1~^I^˨ 9|``’اAm%^&gVt#{f:Ll=O|J|RBwWG,NeQ^?Z4ʧ>Q=>S?JeaqGkk I<G$ױgM7}tBc8#OD#4'+ա[;:Wa,K[GD` _[n k8<`湍iTTLj\]"7pq3ȾԖ;Kh@o2 gI,+{ڼ$:mcb2xR"]<7O%mbF^i۩>ۏPo5W, ~g|V-.H]>$]rQ[&'j8Tw\wn0dy!V1G$:c?٤c#>վ;fmŸiop/RK4v@,qԓޖѯ5E]'))N!Kh^YK%Āרrsí8we8Br3KB*I.H0#=+ipr*{kj1qm3#8kqKի"9H̤+VݤP,rD'RBH-³uKTP$EWQ^&d-v9B1|+XtF \HݕOXѾcħwoå[4q6*\$F|YƕTZ~ ;nh\:3 0 Wad.1*{>Y[M]3A!ˠ="FTV%cݏEh,<kn,1ۃ5ss^%6IcWE!e@$#jъe]ҟpjv2[ǸJz`Ԍw(:үSźNa3Cc2? {)QqnMUqu:#HPF~P2p9?t;P=NFG\:1oEʤvݹ#JmM3 ȪK+pqQXM܇V.Rhay!־=4 d*f;Ai1q*U41JQQg#j<՝]̳2WM u7zLWqJ-g=:wz_l B6FpV^^'6۰I`uRy4v%i&V$Et[4=Ur"}ḏk0d~9Z3&VWD7cKH jc_FHRpOŐ*C*ݽ*Kj+܋LpXQ:([p=ުF;Vq+=6C xS 7xs լ坤%M{K·}*3k5 e|zw-l$UBԐWspm鞙.gCShy &Nc^WCP.7>Ԇ1+WY-M#Sx>ޕݺ]m')*1k=^;8lˋV ɭs+t&>o"9n"U3(daOºo&b,;JۋYRdڐ 'e闆+I` xr;kX[='[ԤZ֟&H15X3kAf45["\go|b;TZب- zdft r mXDbuaیJc{P6 \,|nY%ekٴ@\<" xȑcڽN^)[O65-c][7k~Qtj'cipQ!f9qz \B!cZm񁃑5纎sgJ-;b8`GQWY3t:K5<}^Per:9*<'y[ɩ:v1>bJp==M[u>&?,:7W,ȏEX'u$ fֲ5B mVB[ qֹ Ir p'uVX#88i1"k˓}GB;V֙x.Nc\Lۻ֞!wzR[\Rsb0xn6ES0.OrkI}C\#a$cߊzol3U+2"in(州)baA~khx~B, $R93Yѧ_SxMvC LEִn`Dqd#\Tj)/VrΑy(z#Xӵ_Gi \n OStql֖Q5ƚnC4lCc`\>7ţvԎƢL,]1adv۹^(GneNs]m 8Vh Ļ+ʰs՟1qYmh֒V=Z\E2:9֨J\^FYq4bH9=*>lzNbh W#OVū? 7'|:E`'-8mG\R]mL/nʷIXrrm%ɓH8B}Q{w,qq\ë"Ϙoi z-= YRhbԕkF c֜&6'FjKzmAp?*FTj)vGXqZP>nFqP;)Ǫ+CPd+ 6zl7uF#x{{p9)w.xҦ5nj-17˜XPxt!able to use weightlifting programs such as BFS until after most of my athletes had retired.<br><br>The Bigger They Are . . .<br><br>One of the major - and unfounded - concerns about weight training for young athletes is that it could cause damage to the epiphysial (growth) plates. <br>Although injury to the epiphysial plates may cause bone deformity, there is little risk of this occurring with weight training compared to most sports. As for the risk of weight training stunting growth, premature closing of the epiphysial plates is related primarily to hormonal influences, not injury. Addressing this subject is Mel Siff, Ph.D., an exercise scientist whose doctorate thesis examined the biomechanics of soft tissues. <br> It has never been shown scientifically or clinically that the periodic imposition of large forces by weight training on the growing body causes damage to the epiphysial plates, says Siff, in his book Facts and Fallacies of Fitness.  It is extremely misleading to focus on the alleged risks of weight training on children when biomechanical research shows that simple daily activities such as running, jumping, striking or catching can impose far greater forces on the musculoskeletal system than very heavy weight training. <br>To illustrate his point, Siff compared the stress of squatting with running.  Suppose that one child runs a few hundred meters a day in some sporting or recreational activities. This can easily involve several thousand foot strikes in which the reaction force imposed on the body can easily exceed 4 times bodyweight with every stride. Now let another child do a typical average weight training session with 3-5 sets of squats (say, with 10 reps, 8, 6 and 4 reps), with bodyweight or more for the last set. That bodyweight is divided between the two legs, so that, even taking acceleration into account, the loading per leg is bodyweight or a little more, while the spine is subjected to the full load on the bar. In other words, the legs and spine in controlled squatting are exposed to significantly less force than in running and jumping. Normally, exercises such as squatting will be done no more than twice a week for a total of about 60 repetitions, while the running child will run every day and subject the body to those many thousands of impulsive foot strikes. <br> It does not require much scientific knowledge or computational genius to see that the cumulative loading imposed by simple running activities on the lower extremities and the spine is far greater than the cumulative load of two or three times a week of weight training. Does this now mean that we are justified in recommending that children not be allowed to run, jump, throw or catch because biomechanical research definitely shows that such activities can produce very large forces on many parts of the growing body? <br>It should be obvious then that there is nothing wrong with running and other normal activities of childhood,