JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?Z( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*(\KscA'bU7 .i"zGÓp=Ŵ4( ҕ)ťsRf^}r$؅g+`Ҽqeo{P;?tsqzJWm:t@[H>} 'YH@\{b߇:[7 *:7\W kvcFT`Jq[XVYlݣ0CQ{'Qomqʹ|7 9$wb*ʹ[oW!Xtl@X0I3Kƽp5 m6mDg2sk)%n8uZV<&1>\әs!WAe-,N t2Z*ђ5f& *y.gMhd̟\;Qˈm;<ʮ qOҷ֜gqJ'_xў8U 8ּTmSSC#dbWSm$|Oov$y8OzRw5Tv7Eskion6l) _k)"1U3đVtMj1֪|'h.d]PER"=jw3Feboi?Z%T 84+ĊEaG{j⬎)L^$kY2k '\Tw+$hUЃϿqVvV$Fl'ոRB3+v:)SIs2χ#XU*XHGOa^gFRp}=W < vTho||6ч(5ռW]HuU)+jsyl$$'4d#`(^5HA yjXSp~VFb²1!&uW5eo* G}CuV˚ƃU}͂&ːhλ8PrzA)8P2 $#yY?v"*;?ZlnՋ}# pFs[&qz^F)eGqQ*(AŠĻ;(F@>YٖXLKB'ڙn淸9,Wj<r#ZkVfB4rɩ滳k! G8TP<Ĝr}$=^]#k=kG &@dqe "6KyRa5xiɲg!G2{#HݙU'&u`|%\7+umiI7\ }[Ч%$2Hܹ mACe}5-FR}?Um[X˃w;rw%/_2(dcEvJ[lUQ!}CPaqwLhmq_kLH=[␺[tb8=+c7*wfkZ$Z4١ne!-#{+B,&&Yk`Lˍ$YϩA+KAwˬ\} PH9~ihdHT5a*RnF#ig<}}1]B1܏dUw mNywU(ticʲyP[t ǙVIqۯJ‚[K:|u t`aȓklIBcz2iZ[ 7C“KĨϰy zg$`bfeGjG'cp\ņGF~GM;v9`m )|ǎcwU+q"8ՙ^'1'ʊWm\xoE?i9h>rH +WDm5;g &q3ryWDSZtIm4h]_ C j8&?0p?p3 e֍A"B"FRȊUoxv<,H0GMգԌ\Bi͜fEF8gk#{C{F}b d. =ZB4",!='&cREηkDb'jWV8 Ab *}NJj=COR O"J}pq:T3둛QXpdvI`u&Ge8.Nw S43ʲN<+I?+8G9ekv˓*8?+`E%o(j Sɷ֑94f4l#DB&:3wm<^,`;ۛuKi^.,)8NitJ[2K "E3sXTu}Q-h}f-̩$gpy0@8f5>[JFf.1XCTc$㩫VwOcygHW5ZK *k2泞/ M LِB7*\\XE=ed, 8k-$, 7E'5xqa+ SW[huąV]4#=IEQlcVi,~t'={:"y:Wmw'PK'ۊrcT\s`rTBI$vLf`5HO9Z 5Uׯm[M1 ;NYk=v Io~HC:)#`Gm8h*=BٮZl@m?zs]Yٴ,UiR:}kѮu U $\U''jzޕ}/ownZrQ=0?sZ,wmMHq:G5դ4m֕"h/I]@뮵HAPH_ [M%?(³szZ]IC[ .G~NjP|LݎR:f6mEA5AttL4\ \wzIpZF 8=q*M殩jE`pџPk&‚}[g†DU ߠr5|jʬz vMOVB(&p)Yy71q$NpTzzo>dė3|AݏjY-3+2Ўj HT*9?Ry5[;CX8ښW! d&+m.>ȬU9U;D@:VD5yJcBXܥJ^k2bI<}+FPeL珔p>5"d D%Eι7^{q[ӃJCN9ʛuʪD0r cLMP#6}p~E^({5SvgֹWkQ]b"B?v{~UG0*7j]g9^_BnIDl h=Z7@z μl+a n끍?*WLv4a1r*-/+=jFE$ x&y~e|a|^{V|۵݃#( 6xְY<Ἰ9#D"Sȧou{x"e%՛lY. 9%SI>\Ba3>A:7>"C6ڏ&ډ3#נPK rLդaD1#3H0SgSG@.io2D9nO\޹o[P~oj*pҳ' A3;{E_ѴӪ_em7Jd{͑;K:tLeAa֔E4kd0_S^gMu"w}Gt݃sn{=zӃLvwq f%PsP 'n19 栒X$eta# <~5f SXeUh>*4wjpvƽ?*H It has never been shown scientifically or clinically that the periodic imposition of large forces by weight training on the growing body causes damage to the epiphysial plates, says Siff, in his book Facts and Fallacies of Fitness.  It is extremely misleading to focus on the alleged risks of weight training on children when biomechanical research shows that simple daily activities such as running, jumping, striking or catching can impose far greater forces on the musculoskeletal system than very heavy weight training. <br>To illustrate his point, Siff compared the stress of squatting with running.  Suppose that one child runs a few hundred meters a day in some sporting or recreational activities. This can easily involve several thousand foot strikes in which the reaction force imposed on the body can easily exceed 4 times bodyweight with every stride. Now let another child do a typical average weight training session with 3-5 sets of squats (say, with 10 reps, 8, 6 and 4 reps), with bodyweight or more for the last set. That bodyweight is divided between the two legs, so that, even taking acceleration into account, the loading per leg is bodyweight or a little more, while the spine is subjected to the full load on the bar. In other words, the legs and spine in controlled squatting are exposed to significantly less force than in running and jumping. Normally, exercises such as squatting will be done no more than twice a week for a total of about 60 repetitions, while the running child will run every day and subject the body to those many thousands of impulsive foot strikes. <br> It does not require much scientific knowledge or computational genius to see that the cumulative loading imposed by simple running activities on the lower extremities and the spine is far greater than the cumulative load of two or three times a week of weight training. Does this now mean that we are justified in recommending that children not be allowed to run, jump, throw or catch because biomechanical research definitely shows that such activities can produce very large forces on many parts of the growing body? <brIt should be obvious then that there is nothing wrong with running and other normal activities of childhood, and therefore no reason to disallow activities of lesser impact, such as carefully structured programs of weight training.<br>Siff also notes that bone density scans have proven that youngsters who do competitive weightlifting (i.e., the snatch and the clean and jerk) have higher bone densities than children who do not use weights, and that clinical research has not shown any correlation betweenweight training and epiphysial damage. Further, an extensive Russian study on younduring any play. On offense it starts with correct alignment and the snap count. On defense it starts with recognizing the formation and certain tendencies. A baseball player with uncontrolled aggressiveness will strike out. Crazy doesn t cut it.<br>Hey, if I ve spent hundreds of hours training with natural intensity, and then someone tries to take my position from me or to take away my win from me, they re going to be in for one heck of a fight. I don t need steroids for aggressiveness. I ve paid my dues.<br>Did Jose Canseco experience these side effects?<br>First, let s look at his propensity to strike out. Although in 1988 he seemed to be learning to select his pitches more carefully, by the 1990s his strikeouts were more frequent than ever. Consider this: Was he overly aggressive? Was he often ma