JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?g`U3eϥmlqHz\Y Ia,$w){HM_O; }`+zա`Q ]kk(mC)B#SiXzNc8J.&N)LYӥ&h`QJTBOҝqnZȒte!#ޥoydž.'q֜"|Qw85r"/%#.NҢ}'[˺" '+o wL14K35*iK wջ.LpڳO[eH+.V(4_ROavUa' hͨi`l?~=huڸ5N-.ZKg|"G&{Nyw 5[CmKwu:+I9gw޻@?m-^*S..<42 n+/6#w8O_C5Ȅn*[rUl^ KGH\73*🇢,D 7R]#iK987帍$#5mOՕ*As^ULե2"?4~+uu0a52dGc*M\d5-4PG=h̬NM.@S ƚ ")7Ԍ=#,@EV'ڻ)5gsnO@ W71?JojldKF)@3Y75mZʊ x>uڡT HkN2a@,qcNR~YD|;Zim`ibxbfzUJ;KxR'8Sȶ$Cu%N?:j3U<sޓI;YHTY%D$88;ႱL[xT Mb1~.`` %@'Vni~lj HGА=Ɯ9#1xqn#y.'.# h@*ȌH#.f'/sV-cx;sw5[e?ZK vD`gqmڟXQlg)r[]_L I"٦]܌v'g-JC(ؤ4RdI'e\͔$֜ʚ99Iz:]󙼯"c-am~\~ux#/Oq}+-:q֬oZ3m\ͧ5݌g5Y@ߐGV㫋xX`Hײx7gqkSHMv72mèw+EysgڪMU}0kF"Fk'Ru,cGV֋[V~4P7`V5$0Oޝ&]g\iƓ n*+ч  \Zs;M&xa-E mq{mBE$qcZ$q^uxr#MOY<"=v*ZCA*ϛ7 nkLeNqիe&%⭻c|Vd:涋}뗣9^)ب \B9ZwbQ V'crlImIZԂp-g#n? ?pZ3p+{-Xx>QVJqQ['4jTiՂ w=Y#?Ӳz;ӊmA3,y\.\MsƤo ÿ;U2 6 ⷣJN;*}wb+?r:$|]d i異gMyΣ pһoICWesJdaĸaUcMyWq !/Ҝ P4R1p~ÑN`iҨ5H=7c'ߚi9MeY7H0]Z9 8iKmx0ۿCZ LǥI2ql4[DDHc NƐ1[M%QB1{Ut;g.ohp3 q\R~:1+yy$Oz4 L8q&E2qV#O }MGoD"~&:Oy\ _z9&߽G$ wډFwԠvURs;`L$\&9'X-V zTt @Սtkk "@T`@0;jڐFޱ)!=EeqM$g=q5vR @;@팎E0 #ֺOrM7PUC9 )lة~:}j=a~AT9v8r"iw$1M&jWl^B=})OjQNWI'9cI'}z|*sx8jW ;|"#''uk \G@3YT\7&5O8@K䞀4!/ LCI>#'zF[[;!kN,9USo7 tʧ % rO\Qi|d,z*EMs(ZƢOnA5@rqSRMN8^T* S@U42Ty%ɂ3N`}§#hʒH8ȬPеM&`H9H&VpsҪڳ. ϚF>r `s3d vzGS^1V !ZL8(% c4/_0 #F*úUnX01Yѻ8=*X/X) #ۚE8*U#ec~4U?s of Veronia School District participated in the use of illegal drugs. School officials were concerned that drug use increased the risk of sports related injury. The school district adopted a student athlete drug testing policy which authorized random urinalysis drug testing of its student athletes. James Acton, a student, was denied participation in his high school football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.<br><br>The constitutional question was:  Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy interests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed by limited authorities. The court also stated that governmental concern over the safety of minors, under their supervision, overrides intrusion of the student-<br>athlete s privacy.<br>This case answers the question about drug testing student-athletes, but the question of testing the total school population is still open to the court.<br><br>Summary<br><br>More and more schools, in Arkansas, have been going to the drug testing program, not only to test athletes, but to test total school population.<br><br>The teachers have developed a growing concern about drug testing and infringement on teachers rights for privacy. After the student survey went out, the Personnel Policy Committee sent out their own survey to the teachers. Now we will have a chance to see how teachers will react to the possibility of being tested. Let s see if they can behave as well as their students.ust starting a job at a new high school. The school had some success, but Shearer believes that was due to having a team with a lot of natural talent, since the athletic program hadn t yet developed a tradition of winning.  So I brought Dr. Shepard up to do a Bigger Faster Stronger clinic to help set the goals for the kids, help bring the team together, and develop a common bond and a common goal. I had been in t