JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================mK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?Ҽ_qu/ TH~5뚰ҴYn~_9PmV84;ᾎࠎ+㑏|ޫnF.i fpŴxW%6vfvnYZ`&}CH4^٣YGnGM9MZU_P Jav!dVrjKYӇ)]shz9b蚿c=M5thй5x4X7 ӎX2)JI+i$*%"$)?_^kBI%ٙCb zjWi4aPϘqҧQh%(a {38I$/e!s$d#[jGPKacO2]d^0_S'_@ydIWh\=VL˨6DzӳCGK59gk؏;WU7~`hܴ*QKkn4|d})0#$$(cj*m$h߇|F4O݃=}+YƟ%9vXľX嶓JFu*D@)?V eII6Ϸ5ttt;SVѱ/,d$g >sv('Hcu s{!L)86LbS Vb28Wk\b޶:85ȭ/k91[<UV'>OjZi0w3=Jmn-Y2blnmjkH弊X" c?W,e'6(PJ*xMBKdEv">R|ҵu ɠC ~rFOr0rk0ySԌUk·gȊ1RC.Goz-lI$U$Xc~`x2y\Vsӄ:Tg}4pke>ourbut )3Jsw+JZr{fjTc&KgbIcL a duc$wpf+.zmZ~BLdq胵JJiiniQ"6rke.Y>R@[> b#OKsֹY{'IRNMg:଍KnU#GJ? ~x,f=v6U/Xiyp? V_Mw~Bml9G#j²0I vn2%%vStle˪GuEKD``yOӣ=T4!# ;(*.8NdOi鲙pNpxjރvh,[,8ӭ`>l* $g ]>A#W @:kY!ƬH7ɷk,ku˯B{6hxI[3w/'u:QY0 @@҆tHr~l5 k]'ZFqxYipz½U;# y^?8>)o1"ѳ6H==~Twra60OX]dhKqj UKo iֲ̱6cCl=zՖ,/[g5Z[[3Z9?eR]TVhmHr{*ݾcr˥"uR_zYe?;۶A\׀5&9$s059||6&xVb*)kEA.p& $EHN+ɽvZK%`;sA h0rzH̝6F윐@Sqݳ7PэוfaKpqPXxzm~ bw&aˏH ^Sr:j0x7 )\ʱ˅`xW{ǨD\c%AM+.KV29ɨ0y6}aTf{$ ?\Division I colleges do something very similar to the BFS program. All the programs featured in this journal are quite similar. However, there are some major differences between Division I colleges and high schools.<br>One organizational difference is the many two and three-sport athletes at the high school level. Many athletes are always in an in-season training cycle. This throws college periodization programs into an unmanageable situation. The primary in-season goal for a college program is to maintain. Should a 16-year old three-sport athlete always be in a maintenance cycle? Of course not! This would be absurd.<br>What if a Division I athlete misses a workout? He might lose his scholarship. How about the high school athlete? The BFS Program is designed to create massive voluntary participation with daily increases of self confidence. It also flows easily from one sport to the next and unifies all sports into an easily managed total strength and conditioning program.<br>Division II, III, NAIA and junior college programs are also different than Division I programs. Much more development usually needs to take place. Voluntary participation is more important. The BFS Program is easy to implement for coaches who are not full time strength coaches.<br>Bottom Line: There are many great programs at the Division I level. To say the BFS Program is better than Nebraska, Tennessee or any other Division I school would be a bit presumptuous. However, I would say that most Division II, III, NAIA and junior college programs would be most successful with the total BFS program simply because it more fully addresses that particular situation and a