JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================u" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?vR6gn㎔M ٭#NYrAn|S7ɝbF[H,=4܎j7OM6ezg3=GG+l?-ۏ| 'ymvxLj|(6 cN.s]70_.¥fHVPOYE=XsM+bxÖ!|v@[ ˸_b: v d|_}:nn~.0?gӠOM[ʭRbntz)-nmb$>!^+T=x|(4Tyʱ.l5τ.qҤEo3ǒ;ToĖ!!316>m4* ⽷+dv i>w=}}?چŞd@ Om7LOZ»hx"2c:*u$I>bcE\~?%n?ԏYN*xl.0A,u(*" /ng$q3$}ݶ{yp`Y@EBHSo:K(%Zz!\]4-m.-).d@V|"6 lTu&+IG%7:ʻ,y#q!џBnl$mK`61uN- ]Oi\U:]lNcy[1A՝:^:FGByuYQ$zlݎ>V'E&IvlQZHC}ܳJIO-SZi:bYF'.84ɴ[X0BFҼ1划To~xéJPZ)Xwu=j4}?_r%#<˚WKѦKKT\D-> P6ɂUsBGvab)I¶T A/mdA29 gZ6tI6-|9xa %òqT_u[KP\[?lJ85ԯcݎD5K TřcJEWJRpF:cs)~/}yzwƉ!Ut渺`Gn9OT]RAg?No7 WNmfU]:֧KsfOLTԮLF8E(bqizf_]P+}Oj>!(fvR{<{ruOaUFIb3ץpL 海TKv`kZnld-UXpCpeh 9 Fo4Vvx==}+Gj4MC iQ:MjsȗÞ"Æ =]Ͷ.IC:gbo^F_æh"Vcu5ht#Mz9'5[Nt;%qg5BW,O׽aUk݇QE)C.wX'?n֑-|x|F?ǧҠ}VPn^;}k9(bNL8жC!VcӮSk3PWAyBim2D*Xs r?T?mcnUú;KգMB!ְuu&Kdh2֋v?WuM)Tɴ\d+V#m#ؽ*m@&9Ed;4W28 5,wǭO-h qx/4:(@1#pqs?֥NV+VH&Z8ֺt"Mۖ +$8铊9 DL:nUW 9$]n:Ua $ɼ 2) s[H].af Gz—I8].y@<|y~y4,y'k9m]NޘVO{VN4E@H^~a\3F㎧%K#pN~yHH\Q|Ҷ;i0Gg&u-;'1KF}N}i}GFޝqR Q*g'Ѵ(BQWGTc+|3 =+">5wm ޴'aZTc;u3+TqxS^y* A+;FVNGZ6nOK]mBO-֯U6m5ω*mݞc>sR0W*w V8V$ƞ P!CPhPXBƊ(Q@ )(޺--$FElrMd]"gXA-ܒFpIֹ* ;QIs!X1E<?)6.)8 vE=-rA8VY! wƴ7 K^vF- >}mj$SUҮ9+<-e Mj6j߀nsʱfnDglǽU&`"ctʜZ;夞{4qڹ-Zfum&/f~:V)1^bt[ I'vtnJȧifn1f aw+th.ē+6@֣y{hJƹQU+H-d`r}7+Z&yHEuqE%Ef1vl'(y^T6:oߒշQ-PT ]hڵ|'jW`s^UIbx xK#wt`;u@kzͮL :ºnfY۔\$SgpG%䑡僴LJ'GҺ-cY"XڥK IYv"\`>8gk~ tJjѹ7wc*w*2ITuխP0(XiJpǹ]J`#h|҇4I^9^0 3_Jirfo]Cj1B7F0: OR2݆3ZBCj"rZ.RQV3bGE9zW捇nYr׺C[ kk1]qC8۝OKGqBSN"Yܟ#$}).Xu8k{XBQ( {afc{\:QK{Jvfu[\ޏ5Eڪ;ё$5$HەPcGDysD#FD'"8xor!'1wR|C`~LTHe$e]**vV3ghNz\Vpٕ5u?`rr4먌[Z0 S*Z;5Վ vDM/{Yt%_)ɌM<I O$~u mzRCɫ,-5b 8t/J4d[y%\C!p }:W;mjS>:>AS=մ{ EzOWN\Rf8鮣Ym!#`:d~ĒYmL(5ꖢ]cl003\ċc*%qתlIw<br>The constitutional question was:  Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy interests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed by limited authorities. The court also stated that governmental concern over the safety of minors, under their supervision, overrides intrusion of the student-<br>athlete s privacy.<br>This case answers the question about drug testing student-athletes, but the question of testing the total school population is still open to the court.<br><br>Summary<br><br>More and more schools, in Arkansas, have been going to the drug testing program, not only to test athletes, but to test total school population.<br><br>The teachers have developed a growing concern about drug testing and infringemen on teachers rights for privacy. After the student survey went out, the Personnel Policy Committee sent