JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================^K" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?i-LҮL8B涋CRRkhaAy ]iĞP3tVݟt;hIgp3!8NQtE GZO͜r,ʪXt38:V1F]WR*ݦܔFKO֓;[FfvrI9Oٜ(VQ 0RGr2 ]*nJ]aT+Jp7T@ t)$VEm KFp +8om.ʅٶni]LEJX˝SM&(Wdz,-gvv(:Tdr3)Fid{E\^8m$T~#GjVVr ӧJw*\Ģ;HDm$U d7E=[{3F,ܜnB8b=*a6b7)mn5'e٥-!?6>5Roc-ۖF5CP1On 9.(13@W$fZ˥6@϶:Eo$VCPa4- pq{2HG 96kq{I jLjYY΍3Txb00%P}zkXn.7[ n Z an-Ĭ%I&HrZMbX5԰¤ Ž~tht3S"d'PdpQRh$QnbQST,p'"%!IGDT9ѳZxV;݄BC&1wƶBj~3Vރx68$5CV(r>n{Hs׫4(8* NmGڥHZ[1[@co)ju%KTaj/俕t߯"ϱ%i^jɕY*鴁k ڹ)弸s6:"akb&k+m_5~q٬QuW4lIbu#`k[Z_U;+(<*pÒ =y˚W='M I&n4{=«.G#jv~k$k1#j\H%>l rAe>J)nt3}`a>(54ϪD֦*ǥ$:Ji:҉W?v'mN;Sa#0)ژ=+(BfAUU8}Fz|ې}i%Vw=烿A¬ lGuPŗҫ#rKǷߡFvH~sPhR)2d`sr$LWl݄!T9+YjMGZ<br>What are the advantages, if any? Each core lift has its own unique time constraints. For example, the Parallel Squat takes longer than the Bench Press to complete the same number of sets. Therefore, if you have four squat stations and four bench stations with a system of rotating from one to another you can run into challenges. Your athletes doing the bench get done with their sets before the athletes who are squatting. What do you do? Well, they could stretch, do a burnout set or do an auxiliary lift. So it does not need to be unproductive or a waste. However, with the one station-do it all concept, there is more efficiency. Your coaching becomes easier because everyone is doing the same lift. Your time management becomes more precise and controlled. The athletes could get more intense if a competitive atmosphere were created with everyone doing the same lift. Finally, in most cases, the one station approach can save space.<br><br>What are the disadvantages, if any? I can think of only two. First, the cost. T