JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================f" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?x '4)@ F8c4IIR i!Wԭt> 67ĄѲnP#qKc̵eQ'(n18r:Wya]]x2vY2cЯbF\ һ'Nc2 58vcÿyǺ8nV; q/i{4 yFN=:;&7}=*9)89)Xe2J\J(xfQH.c& ZO/;@Rtw?QlG^j}nJi=B$;cmO5Һ:hPՒxNՂ W6<6|#8]_h8cT@W3]brF&qrbEџ$>'MY71Z0bX֨x,pOMz5+{-'Uz~iw+E]\y]u̩ڥR'};t ;b`$~U::u4EӫC5Yƭ{)$ojb\;AːbNia$nܴGww64G ɸ"Zw~uy,P[R9w SZwGj0]ä\"m~S &\}Nݔ<'z/sys$/s7b:@޲+$9,@CWܨ'e&t,67%s׃ֲ&G.eKAH؇P2y:$8AJ5˽=Y;~4ZSrw,o$Ys1k Dk(3>ߚ%~9_5V0T9h5/Ȣ?FHOכ.fvG(!L9 2sڛ#Iq qǶ+13$G#:QXڥouAiXdZt5g\\δa N2yYwrw6{Wt%HNATh7^FH2I שb>b_1NyV!{ʭ'x"-L!'b]nצEy%${uCכYua3䛘qUߣt*>(¨g_/6KM-k [w|zgp;~Z-j27sz K22%pY5r;޾[iHŸ8kx4~H֭)ͧqEp\Se勱fcď2WqQN;3f&$n8jCv6*; ;bQWoj&bw0}6.n^=cjٴFx)ԃ*-0Z<_=զM~urq|@Ȓf12½,$\((㯥Fc7<"y wQV;4xUr9cҊ*&"Э~).y9gX6y4QOKi`!.#8+^yw" him the means to put his theory to the test. In recollection of the program Rich established, he proclaims,  Needless to say, the weight program was a huge success! The Junior J.C. s of Colorado entered my program as their project and it won the state award and went on to receive national recognition. Ric*u-<br>And the Court Says...<br><br>In 1995 the Supreme Court ruled that drug testing student athletes was legal. The case name was Veronia School District vs. Acton. An official investigation led to the discovery that the high school athletes of Veronia School District participated in the use of illegal drugs. School officials were concerned that drug use increased the risk of sports related injury. The school district adopted a student athlete drug testing policy which authorized random urinalysis drug testing of its student athletes. James Acton, a student, was denied participation in his high school football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.<br><br>The constitutional question was:  Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy interests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of coll