JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?nsKIK^*GK U=JZJZ (QGPEQE9 ZJ(Phi -!{QEgR Z&E@ ( (4P`Vet ;W^ ) QMRQIJZwZؠk zֺf(@V4~SȑFvکiQGj*.1)i-Rb (i)xT J}M\7՞dVV!0; ÿ1]YJ7zc+fI(PRZnv~Ԏ[ܹ̅v}GXGrT9gV8kK]W4RR5(Եy|PQ]r0xLrN?ua"3Ђ^K靉"5+gL};Sv0fBէf?zSQ.os?#ZThC*op6woxXCK}"]1 GV>+nZ*1d9MuG&(#h6*|Ɯm*J>ʼ2ӎ+ƌe7zE%%'?y葜2>ӪM%qjW*;% W9J nRC8Ydކ'j4{.fS$Ai2Fz T:IJ2,-q$pJB9Vz`6U 0cT5Hx$rX`dhftRJGkowF;ݲ_\:q,!;PNչ܋{a߂]@R6$i^e7țk[Ym?UPNC{E7 a]A,08甼{g34@qRHB[%Ă(N+jR׮YN.-#pC}+ͬ<976~5&[y.OS^v&BSNQFh()((H_P!$sҸA H{θ뗖f9ZKf!BĞ[Y*3 VV574\~;KXH% uY~T?ljCGJFmhr# -0xd n+2Fx~ՙCU)[ <ԕp ( ( (THsKE 9Ii6+mKq#UψV/]);&\}"6#$'J}m.Yp)F*ʶJSii~i{هvxGy@GvvLڼujOmp[kz*{H۩jYٞiiՉ|v 2dzۮJq33QE!ES;QKE>(HQEjV-AE2Yn k&%ewCT-ں$ ֩5u###rfPq~]!֌sAe~iGl5jX \aA; p8>ÓUu;Y<$ẩ5ӆ"/aڤ0P Vpy,):k#fhީ(͂QEQEs0gmǫ xt}k8xt vh_ #>ۅTm+LeI`fdyqN]n\~i/LrOFsԂp KlVEfUp`Vq:$ڊ*ڢ0Ɗ*rpa[F,QNiIOvJĔ~ONQI8۱hIJEeb)-~xcoϻҬ[Q[RTH[gcGК(J;R#Kq)This would be absurd.<br>What if a Division I athlete misses a workout? He might lose his scholarship. How about the high school athlete? The BFS Program is designed to create massive voluntary participation with daily increases of self confidence. It also flows easily from one sport to the next and unifis all sports into an easily managed total strength and conditioning program.<br>Division II, III, NAIA and junior college programs are also different than Division I programs. Much more development usually needs to take place. Voluntary participation is more important. The BFS Program is easy to implement for coaches who are not full time strength coaches.<br>Bottom Line: There are many great programs at the Division I level. To say the BFS Program is better than Nebraska, Tennessee or any other Division I school would be a bit presumptuous. However, I would say that most Division II, III, NAIA and junior college programs would be most successful with the total BFS program simply because it more fully addresses that particular situation and athlete.<br>Best For High School: The BFS Program combines the best of strength and conditioning from all over the world. It recognizes the great differences between elite, pro and college athletes compared to the high school level. It is perfect for large numbers of athletes, block schedules, women, junior high, in-season and off-season transitions and the multi-sport athlete while creating greater self confidence and massive voluntary participation.<br>Bottom Line: Coach Shepard and his staff of 13 of the top high school coaches in America have spent a lifetime perfecting the BFS program for high school. Every phase, every nuance has been well thought out, debated, tried and tested. The BFS Total Program is best for high school in regards to winning and we pledge to always continue to look to make it even better.<br>The BFS Program articles found throughout this issue will define more clearly the BFS difference: BFS Year-Round Unification Program (20 & 21) Coaching Made Easy (50 & 51) The BFS Set-Rep System (page 74 & 75) and Three Unique BFS Lifts (76 & 77). of all time, Vasily Alexeyev. Siff saw Reding squat, all the way down, without wraps, 880 pounds for 5 reps and perform repeated jumps