JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?kh˒xNI cnk\w$-62Vا~vG\+F+P=+&HCGR5@BH(U$2vԡYT+u.\s Ticpr:sS8&'mZ(#SLŲ}Vdq:$ e ' *{ uuoj3qFM ]ӄΠJֵ`%\wBE2ԉ\T@<+pA'q޸|jxy1؏T@7&hX7x["?.HPWj\~_9)_kO}WQ72I;v8})/nc8"8ĒƪQkf෵VrMlڹ|Dn1 ?:<)+VHc`H?xw _*P~7x4u;%+ع%Kou]Rd!z^Ef~/ӭZ;zdrS[U+hr#Z6YFCgߵfxf221†T,eH62e1[i}AG'ƽ+^*(Em t@,1Nzi?rE}Ix昄0(yxBltycJO4cj.=Co5aOrohz Lxzߡ3ܹ!Tpqu#$M*oiwGG2jZW7(@]?aXXvZ6G rιAb[O#فH*s+ˋ"\$.~9WGm `V7-ҁY18,sMj>ψsjXt9eaw5J-κ*/5F¨My74ۗ5MBMV0*N*Z`cyn*~ii,1,_j.Kfm.b"8ުL'-V2z%UdKl01{^sHRzU> pzQ[{8v#0ovEOa3Fδmu+ 7w?g3`O}k=%R *8B×$92IoƁB ZCӸy;})Fsޔm=AbYbO( CSNúI sOYhqȀ +VNl/[kmppj{:oH2eR18#swڔaF0*h܃~#9Ȁ%bW'')a)5Vg`~Z@2q֗~M ]2w9̑W!rQÐ1ixӐEABϭ`u@<ҚOҐZ(atˡ1R&y8gޛaqIHoaRsS7A#p*% gҐs)!#?1Q>wH1.PsU{(Yͮ;h@f1 gf4HdlVf;U60J$,s1%&75#B뵳Z-9u2JR֏C"nUx؀=1RZkO5i~ (hl}LMuJ͢hu.GnZxLLKX`1~uq1i:nXL< $Ehdc#={j֕aQzK bpNhQ T{X˝#,Oz[0:c[95Կff^>sEId:Sf>/BLy8Fr}=OK'BcR &m"yB*vPzWY+5֣47 1鎃[麌E4c pGWtS5U$sXW}SjCNF{^kj2k:󎕥j5%3seZJŌq1'UԔ'n{AXJ Io|$ e=? <5szdRFV4=~+c3KV,0wc5Ug[5b#N-4acز `]n`Rx|%fv +9*Swc΁ˌ[z9 XsnqdΉvi@929>^ϳ`$0<{b9w[ǯ.w"6xEYыȦ$xbZbM!##v3wК @'q[8=OxbلZ)lF@}Nǹͺ/Z<^)\K` HEJR!`6Xc0,G2i8@]lhlw{zQOF@@ͱ ܧ510>Xzl'ĝ2zqrZYc*<Ո\H0U :wF *L1 1*EO U};)'!@Z'*w t @Y]v,lG;*qۡ%OQV 8?7&9$=hi-9c@mo98'7^H(@\MA#N ĕ\F*N{`杴d#҂rycO9#V$H?2}if> 8 0"9h=8vʍ?aσZAO>YS1/(gHe_$]Q v!!r 9QǨ 1AqE$S,X7iUIc*@>2`{E12ӴdYMRIcޙVc\(n lZXFvC؊u`bzb]Hbk!b }j*7QY*P F!8@FIF9m{|MsTD ,j\/*jٰyMW=:U!2\g Q)Inݯ-P.~7_Z鄶gx ~ Bd`QĒ ǥ7&0f NGq@īrsEIGӒi1Bq}H4xoFZc$eggQs! s7ZOH ?ZNI޽'_[۬g'dg<$Yys^M#A-v @~4Ժt9oZ 2+[[~QkaEWc36p9c$#ÕT|}D^i֊*yPBiF֊*PHO2EHb-cSBwqS.cE $u*'ϿUPH%,K=@FB1)RF cQCwW89_Q9@ c {hTool football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.<br><br>The constitutional question was:  Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy interests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed by limited authorities. The court also stated that governmental concern over the safety of minors, under their supervision, overrides intrusion of the student-<br>athlete s privacy.<br>This case answers the question about drug testing student-athletes, but the question of testing the total school population is still open to the court.<br><br>Summary<br><br>More and more schools, in Arkansas, have been going to the drug testing program, not only to test athletes, but to test total school population.<br><br>The teachers have developed a growing concern about drug testing and infringement on teachers rights for privacy. After the student survey went out, the Personnel Policy Committee sent out their own survey to the teachers. Now we will have a chance to see how teachers will react to the possibility of being tested. Let s see if they can behave as well as their students.the exercise was an integral part of thetraining of Russian weightlifters.<br>Charniga's glute-ham bench consisted of a padded car seat nailed to a carpenter's bench. He placed the bench in front of his power rack, and hooked his legs underneath a barbell so he wouldn't tip over. BFS has refined this design, and recently introduced the roller glute-ham, an adjustable machine that offers the benefit of a round pad that rotates as the athlete moves.<br>The window of opportunity an athlete has to achieve optimoach Bob Stoops was just in the process of starting a new era of Sooner football.  I wanted to win, remembered Josh.  The quarterback in Coach Stoops' offens was supposed to be a pivotal guy. His quarterback was supposed to be a key man and make audibles a good percentage of the tim