JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================i" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?0hJ#$ .UqFRX SRXfPmhGu#=*9T́H P\8槵{#g3V+}jv,oc(\&x\dI 6Kr(%;_´WYRSlJYFn$s3T%B6x>=O+ȷ^ȥ=(*~qcO,8p2f~{uo/pU>3+%3_gffxL/0X13]DEnA\bERK" !@YM#s}jFϥY\drA,)q2I=i9g5iUA;G,}+:.{I2m3K|"Q΃|`vrJRI|FC;Sg]gJjե3n'k)}3\9a0p);P(clG3[k^i:Զᶲ*FE\IΘrA+G8 H!*-锫` ƶ)5∟R pAΥOTi:IJޭw @bm28Y$Y:5i.TE Ӡ?CCʶ-z2):/յ9Z[Qqn۰鞵utˉvI9Px-44֝f|3۞.tf3gg1(*w2}1օBQ͆ Ui4AgfK$_*:Ob4Renc:)q, )C6O`czıKd&KYtc p#RP0K!!eU]8j,G,ыX!3h0U@>Jxhh?g!1x9 gV@#Ur@X->0ڂlYwUBj}IeJlS!MIo}argr+T>7MFm#w%U>·5Ol4|C 1@j's LxP{tNQى>Ua|XnTR X5(79 )8%Zh6sv{5ާO*r@ǧsΆ]HeRT14 %V'*#VcbP\gດ@s$Y9AvZ:vWWƳ#^>\UHn$y*m$ ҰoQDÂW"gktbP0jc)98.om$ʄ2?)7M:xbO ?Ao+]譭F!eic,4qz'c;YB;7Gd=ݴWlEuglZD$⳩h:Os zeV#Ҋ6UFw9ПJe^{f;(&"CMǜn;5"$1+3Z$>B'FNsbѥNOQZe^^AdK;|Oη8g(I"$,dUnCM 9,ÜD2iƑ#w$7Һ=?LԵyDdPr1uX&9'kn&I$rASTGdf ļ0@VeCsp&""F jZ$cX5#XS'@T7qMMp gqܾ4ۋxK&gp7fkVs1̀;:sie:54kyJG9WeF+,M %cy9U5 O1#e+GJK;ԣTۯ֡JnZI{5ʵ.t$81?JELLzuJh' #,XӭH/#Ǚ!pp8$.^W2[o4I˖,rуO=y75d,)S۵ohR8p)=7ݝnct^V;zWd bՏjx1e9 ䷔ǾGaԅ89&4hݑ2#XYċwZ+ Am$MY}+G8n<֮GSss$dg b8˟vp(oίZɧd(FkYYjԗ1F'ҵtD$ܬ%eZ I T ulkDih6\)'$ե9w5jdvj{\ub1 b{f!}]pZeZ0Q>Jh;At*}.M1UV`C9U!pT֗/q7a4q2Bdi,7OF-n[_Xw93'<$V-">zG5~rTӲFт9>gV$u} gvc4τ4HF s֊uAi4lngڭ&=ͣw4b]!-"#g ͸$(ǜIeoRi|ͳO*Σk7L#0+ѵ.G,|="8'$Bxm[r9GO\I,R=ibӢf#&k)JF8Eix3jnBOܥt5wKQ\JM`s k[I`9\.~#EC 9f3R=8=\nY6FOE]&gJ 9v8Y\a oWuQٔQE[ 0$U9R1n5"DLcdtSL*zTi{!ckm<0h[q&ivkS\9#EUZ&A -MYDk{b+QcUz;mF_&EHXoB J։I EHڴwe5گ9EU(&u]e, had been tested. To our knowledge, no one has tested positive. However, these tests are supposed to be confidential. It has had no negative impact on our athletic programs. No one has heard any objectionable comments from school patrons.<br><br>And the Court Says...<br><br>In 1995 the Supreme Court ruled that drug testing student athletes was legal. The case name was Veronia School District vs. Acton. An official investigation led to the discovery that the high school athletes of Veronia School District participated in the use of illegal drugs. School officials were concerned that drug use increased the risk of sports related injury. The school district adopted a student athlete drug testing policy which authorized random urinalysis drug testing of its student athletes. James Acton, a student, was denied participation in his high school football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.<br><br>The constitutional question was:  Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy interests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed by limited authorities. The court also stated that governmental concern over the safety of minors, under their supervision, overrides intrusion of the student-<br>athlete s