JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?ăR tӜKքn%6>J_, os-F S"&[jPJ@;Hr7cuf (H;T**=i(pqC!)s24 q@j#|ۜS7e#9ߌO<iyO)\.x@ _FU]ԟ\TGqTLؒ컌N'eMg㒴sȠvFN$tnҲINb8 Ч@džLR|<&&sڜ<ҫiK{ fp\6_JCgdw9Ӱ՝t dO3T=AZfou|!T#޳Kq:ܜ )>xaI;q؜.;z h9cWgkWA 9( hNjuV#fBZoXL=O]L+v.hՒG{7XGU%*X%6?$ bi_]`XIk$ZI$ E Vvr꧊wiqjB̧I=sR_n$n1h $4\4in1c7i`52}T:LF>cN+zL(MAս*DgE$R(WP2PV.eBKUR0j^GmG,BʟZGPs#Jڐl.;TƩͧ 1ڶ ]I Ny0JMI;NZΏ&q!Hs^{oios]l;QU9#gO+шIRG?:}Bz{ם@m&7(Hkk`SX|xo03ӥ; 袣QOWiZ 8߅u:G8SKNGY붭dY`@ݥWʔ"vBc@:VŶ"nfEMc\ⱔttFu ;pݺlf:ψ%TVv3^w /u F.zא|DY;$񫰌ʈXu95D&ÅejIAJ͂3Z3e[=!rs ; ]&"&*\8E!Hrk4(@X881ƽ+g̵B{w`[^/Z`jxH GZdq?J%O5 RNÁ)^6>bB_eZ?s*@YZp8 >هՏ/NR]FOlJAF+G<]kuowC"NXe>syZ][R귒v7m FU8^Ae+y.LOpR/7»+NQ¬ ]{="Š#\Is> kw63?WSiؠ[{xqWK۷JUӥ.J t@̽@,C3\{i2)HXVkbk+'^d-g|㧭G&ʪ'|K0\Ϸ5s\4Ӵ9%QWjE=ziXMAWvGZ\ Ra!cL>T"[ouyVvAꢊ,#_*/s81Z w7ke1Ӛ__{I8P5MEBe}z$v\;|}Hj,bn8b$U.$iyaBKtvkFi]u1U%}cX-fH_W%=0+?T`F:WEB_LaưDU[$f|W;Y->n]rH<-p,kӯd(G zMFy^/cn[Gz?ÌfWFSylN'FAҜNg&v:fn9V#Gқ#JF`I)ہ^go?uu9  ՉJ 0uga>eޔms;/|%{*HE;Ķ2,R !UF_#,k:ROɝXcmF|eekLp_]KR0Gq^t9b+R11Hla u)oO*Ɔf\x&r`xu&}/P'|RVN[5#-CEVE%\EcOk Ua;ԡBqU'yڿt~4 7 4!7VaQ1\?uX+,O_jޣ#Y+3ҧ5%rR폧ږVʯ#*ssJ$RTMM-pqֱ5†8 {3"Nz 57y8TsJj?;jye]5뗢8A;Sy5`@/YPrA5}J.? [+#@RjW"k/'Dque۝VO-0e]d,rI 77.; ɭ{YUl*3+OAwndkik|*gQerp$]49P#<0+|m3O#jY¬i[s)u[ؤb8+=}+ܣe kK vκdy:S= A3Or9z6mSK-d *Ve,=j} -pdR9 *jpJ?u4OU#7Z,v)(c^[5!ÐAkuxz@H wSV5N٧qQץ\?#N}=3ko#9ypR1m'? ʦ7:G쀾F޼:ۭO))t].Цɯ<~>Ugeb~*Q(lVf+0{WMo E NEV6FK8;µ9yx[2A[JA#pTr?W#& +d2Zk[F1 c`lX^'5d[٤wwɞH>c𤒹^\g1<i Ÿʽ;)KyKzxpѯ4ipKV?uS唢8㚚1Cl,#-%f֍X?*#~ºbQ *SH&'=k Kh6E>WܞdW/o3'=jĖV]cUy&E\*#4A֛OLS'466ydY9(Bd3€ۚp=i=zRJq?l^y'EEyn/n. &55x/|?*[,nE[).7w<㊨#9˙hȭ xÓ0:t!֜)؆wc1wa ֦MS#t*P W֢vP$zι wWzIyq\t2\\<br>And the Court Says...<br><br>In 1995 the Supreme Court ruled that drug testing student athletes was legal. The case name was Veronia School District vs. Acton. An official investigation led to the discovery that the high school athletes of Veronia School District participated in the use of illegal drugs. School officials were concerned that drug use increased the risk of sports related injury. The school district adopted a student athlete drug testing policy which authorized random urinalysis drug testing of its student athletes. James Acton, a student, was denied participation in his high school football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.<br><br>The constitutional question was:  Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy inteests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed by limited authorities. The court also stated that governmental concern over the safety of minors, under their supervision, overrides intrusion of the student-<br>athlete s privacy.<br>This case answers the question about drug testing student-athletes, but the question of testing the total school population is still open to the court.<br><br>Summary<br><br>More and more schools, in Arkansas, have been going to the drug testing program, not only to test athletes, but to test total school population.<br><br>The teachers have developed a growing concern about drug testing and infringement on teachers rights for privacy. After the student survey went out, the Personnel Policy Committee sent out their own survey to the teachers. Now we will have a chance to see how teachers will react to the possibility of being tested. Let s see if they can behave as well as their students.ɡbg0'Tm+jԊ"c#3Ǯ(. (sw$q0G;BJ{PP ݀=JnϩE[pa8(gDBLn8\|d'#9ݻju#PcژK*O(+͊(n9ڛ56"5 fL)r!H'' .QL2+XPi\[LDA>4$Wy*:zTc'n9cҧ1*A I>ʻbA8$= R}Uu籨1nƣL#{)y2}GQBv:qMb1>ǕHc@E/̘ ~d9wZNWWrJ~~^W{JۦNOk5ŕ/`8^