JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================dK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?[+nUMPLtS1 Pf˱}MB`% T7# i[JzbHpK4]H3gj#lfȱ]CëMx;akl0GJu dF8eeˎpɻyQmmrG@*йԀArӺӿ1Nb4SK5X ^:-jI=),mĒekέta}f|E5pMm_hE[ȡCzV)xVlyR>3ډ``Mw [AiJQ3Ҡi{"TrhވTEk+(7G}, %̆Eȍ{`kx~ksk%Z0y9QXvxoJ&}T7ZQx%iT fbrtjUz=EiB[[E}7}پx^=ұ<ڭvc`[c?2pzjGP܉SKheJt.˘#W9袻x;R>mqrG f*]@J,*=ꤠxRZ81j|̬ۍ*=MF"H|?cW @<H,G:fT<&9d={*)V=_@h؎`*++}?׭wⴏrWFǗ>M6Su(.gfc#Ҵ/n("|caj%M7.TggQZ)ƍ$ʂr2kMY~81C{MMUtTC?4/q6B= R]szVԥR-Wl7Kk:XiI1:縬X|n{[V5O?O֮xf'Iy0,c-IgmΞJZ<y maiv0?.{g2̀ho^8*k-A]|ѾF''Ijoth\+qY|;p}v%$ .$aڻo_rNn.7\ZZeI-Q@2b6U! z!TXwb[0cK{۫|݄ЎO8+Rn&("'kuF2^G':M}rm,uPHd'"q^nuMG !Rez Y4+dM,cB-\iЌ|)Ijcm3;1\>?I_]פ1" s(ɩSÒ,FK^OZ64MTP͜951y4ٜ^4EtX^G%RVOIUU MfeGqB~ˤr2Ӥ:q?U< F 7s9? jQt;axa@C(;Oϥ3'ȏ@]-i'rb exactly a pro team's strength and conditioning program. The difference between these levels is staggering.<br><br>Best For Colleges: The vast majority of Division I colleges do something very similar to the BFS program. All the programs featured in this journal are quite similar. However, there are some major differences between Division I colleges and high schools.<br>One organizational difference is the many two and three-sport athletes at the high school level. Many athletes are always in an in-season training cycle. This throws college periodizaion programs into an unmanageable situation. The primary in-season goal for a college program is to maintain. Should a 16-year old three-sport athlete always be in a maintenance cycle? Of course not! This would be absurd.<br>What if a Division I athlete misses a workout? He might lose his scholarship. How about the high school athlete? The BFS Program is designed