JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================:K" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?aCpU*9U^}ffiu<Ƹ}sf?)+sPt2c!{[kiY@NX(ιVnJi3kZp_o+E׼:t~jDvamoOĖq݌-*"1T'r# y<_IAX&k O#}p faIN»="Y5,7tcY Z&s^ﳀ1R,jGB :V} yJAl>kKKtĒh4k?e 1Sθ.fuZ;9ӌl#EmPZkVWȂ(H ԦFq0g+E'&)')(҆+ MJ6FCF$=)AO)<jdI<٧ܽ3#a9\>թx-h\#&0Q_q3N$:]!\ۜX\:ʮE2=jYm`oozVrR[ח7-WP8t cܛ major feminist concerns of equal pay and the right to choose, perhaps the 1972 Congress believed an amendment regarding young women's interscholastic and intercollegiate sports would be an insignificant concession. At the time, most people (women included) did not believe women could excel at sports the way men did.<br>The popular mindset was that college was a great place for women to get her M.R.S. (read "wife"), and soon after, she'd be having babies, not spiking balls, making goals and vaulting over 14-foot-high bars. Such thinking likely caused many an old codger to grin in secret delight that a "little" educational amendment would placate the feminists yet result in relatively little impact