JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?Т:QDQW"L2b%VPL'VcX j椊{5@BSƇҬzsY#52V2=)s S'XXej9b?j|:Mk Jc]G52aVI `--sZ84;B{T*ZZʗ f i?ivS Z1N}E};۵!JxQF),Dq*RJ)VkfޭByP$Ap:f 䮬hk.SF"}?£w'56Q@2?B)hdqJXbǵL4MI[)>H.zH>Xbdo(GQ]jj󯆐iGy\A?^A6ZhV{{ #p 6An 4 zNORҾ@Nuf•$C& Pӌ\iXjɿL!#cӣs{zci ܬNW& -B"4գ O4KmHsW,<\󎞵yjSJ_ ڟ/ Ѕ]$B|/a-eM ];W 2Uu4nS^X62R]=ip=:| W<ʪL*9Ss|+};zxgځzǧI:Rgځ vt~tSsE|H)O+rO>(C0T:M(1ܪϥ3Dďt%nHg$+ּ[]e[?!g{'Lk/=?#kEKT|y5 ":}c;XW5o[ 61ctiiqPk_Ma2ؠp~7)Zi.[b ո5(<_V#$o=rR][E ^E;1cr8>]j+sݼy zB:"`=^]OO7*pvHϠ`t@$2e'純P[ic-kr݌QQ B\E#FQ1Җ&ZA ͆wE֬{IZqXmeah9%ܬ><>ޢOlvcE>j}.爟i*Yaxz0G[J)S ('ƶCk2Jklx3m -1n TXV8P@P=t)G=1^iAjP WW쁎k#mErRu#hҵ 1i6+b$!\F9mauD OL/9@v]xxr91Rٟ4ZYu9bqS0 q0'$zqVTXLpr;m5{FܹB;WM]Y "%i>`uSY3y 3Yzu84HX.U6Ӷ*+ 1ߢ1hs_SHj?"VbG=n2N!=(szhQul`C";CHqL"9 "HODc'Ue^DGMpeV{2e2w9Pҥ嶸qzF !o%=3EqR?Vbce*P:bC7 i1Aq)"̟4rDoʎ I$t1o>#'zF[[;!kN,9USo7 tʧ % rO\Qi|d,z*EMs(ZƢOnA5@rqSRMN8^T* S@U42Ty%ɂ3N`}§#hʒH8ȬPеM&`H9H&VpsҪڳ. ϚF>r `s3d vzGS^1V !ZL8(% c4/_0 #F*úUnX01Yѻ8=*X/X) #ۚE8*U#ec~4U?s of Veronia School District participated in the use of illegal drugs. School officials were concerned that drug use increased the risk of sports related injury. The school district adopted a student athlete drug testing policy which authorized random urinalysis drug testing of its student athletes. James Acton, a student, was denied participation in his high school football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.<br><br>The constitutional question was:  Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy interests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results areviewed by limited authorities. The court also stated that governmental concern over the safety of minors, under their supervision, overrides intrusion of the student-<br>athlete s privacy.<br>This case answers the question about drug testing student-athletes, but the question of testing the total school population is still open to the court.<br><br>Summary<br><br>More and more schools, in Arkansas, have been going to the drug testing program, not only to test athletes, but to test total school population.<br><br>The teachers have developed a growing concern about drug testing and infringement on teachers rights for privacy. After the studnt survey went out, the Per