JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================oK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?<&?♱B;wW"\\.8`t֍++Zs<ւ9"OewWW`""ZD/ S_vs^BL2zT] q,z}JKQMUc% cq tyO>\犟ºr !P0GsF:gȦK#8*G=+ 6dn\$~ib2OwQUb86Ȭ'5nNiuftǐ2qOZζKhV]dTEr5^ZZI9]5NRud*O%Fih Hcө.I31)hc]^ЗPQ+ow_ٺL3P8湋HMg4mDneIH<}שV\вgqjtq!K V6AX^X.a,l9?[ZGgnR!sC\&rq_t#Hcn 8ϭA?ofh4=Ʊ]0jMt'O0m=x+!ZSbn1xYi@{Hzˬ^\\O܍{tTֶ;bu60z(ג죪 7W&4JqcZ$rEwFi ͵PojQ^qOq|%uH A Hv~orZ)<=8r%QU$L}sMi8ԞiV^OEP\㚆)<5\3F}tХE_2(4i(̹fWXg_>_oA-t>\, ={ߝi±aoH;z!sX. Fd Gpo5Rd凷=VxYbcHffm+Et]=t:s$^a{(廉f'!Ks[E 2sXO#)N 4]7tG_<_gd@ҐHGzP8]ɑd6p+gv*> Wly!IE:4u)ݧ8\=Vsx ?yJ595AZ鴽EniUЪ*3-֒΢BbqoB^ߥZ5amu+4 37<)yCB)҈8ݍ0=H`ՙ<=z1Пu|Ge,m=U5^g$BMnt$T(U} ̌ 9cV\u"ySs.x5d>΍cq'mn$nZ>tQjVndeBPkk;2M5~E(Fn4\6j$qM({ 98DcQ0X.y5szUgzv̾B軷zSE-n&. sDBVEz@SYH/ɩeـĂaȅ~>+g2t+.<=4  V% /]B`pU+aw j5À7T 6=-8+]X}Z^,A'OY<br>DEXA is another accurate way to test body fat. I had this done on myself to compare the DEXA results with the hydrostatic method and the new Tanita Analyzer. All three were essentially the same. DEXA s system uses x-rays and is extremely expensive.<br><br>Skin calipers are the most popular method because of the cost. They are inexpensive but not very accurate. Another problem is the difficulty of reproducing results. In other words, there can be a wide variance of results between testers or even the same tester.<br><br>Ultrasonic systems are accurate and priced right but ther