JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?!RT _ʊOʔ~R~T (Q@Q@Q@Q@QHL(G҂~)3aQGE җKtR—?*_ʀ/@?*?*((?*?*?*}x6<I*X"b[y# );+$Yb*C)<RtSrqEo΢Q+sުͯY]~;vkevq\E$P¦'X^ɡbG\z ]VvIQtE!Ҋ(H? _˥~g:R~]+7^&dfڥcJNJmWŖ[h\pJY %ur+8u16-@#e];T4Q'>Ϊt:(Ճ(*Av 4v[R@{D@Gt[\ʓGTIDTG!|kQ>orvTZƝO58S}*ͽFACp+=NR揆LX~UI,o5ՃW s#*c*Oʓ?J\:UX*\C>Y$6:f/٢/4]6$3;ȥI^sV V(ge2+,\nTQ|ű\gxs,}3Ó Ck}EiåuDyғj\:R¨}P˥ )sb]+ 15LJp Nkw?N^n6l )+`Huhp٫7w׶[iY2jϚ"(lH;01M@1$W"騚F-UDBE?uߗJУoyZt+D͋tQQ_E7̬'"&٬, d'pzu0>ұ-^=G?J)"ȁЩV:EHRTџQU5=ZGEtc) t{QM+CyR3LP\~9<M4 >5G]m׷RK(:U66/bw[4SƠ*sgSDkn hw1U;g#suZV@d GOSެ|*eUڹWKa2$F1sҵ-Xo*fݙȷd29ԅGJo"yFo #!sIZJM8aF1Sy3oʰ_Jˍ›%E; ҹE'.UR4d8⺨\ߎ$M #uA9-˦$Vǥij֐06ф?3Yj>esYÑؕ2pOaJǂ{Әm^:zUԘm%*f=5ZxcSlʾvӦݳp[ WikVtݒ:QEv~ 7-d˱Z+nXkyJ*aRRWdք`%K.׌Ⱦl# ߉>#^8р%dti7 [|#5fSسWǸo"?en#8TvQ֪^iBrj+{T Uc&}At|=[x~ >u3ENH3ҵ&U>@^e,'FmxG$}G W%zmVVgzݻ]FGQ\8A㨫!ؿ1'XS:zt6B5hU{Wx%Cnyd nտt,_=w,èOwzW=Ky ʌ= u6PL@*Ǒ˜diI{QVHifq wa:Wo @R.w}Mq"BmN{4׮)sҚSL$UatOݕ7g`p^oycuw ?Ŝԭ01ǢJ[¦kZr *+&g?ҊΌWSc9#zIXсOz_řϛCLAһaj]谏~ j9doXXn.K[-Ciydt$!\v1@ = dz⥒,eaڕ#xR錍Sh=iu[Y)*.g*Dפx2 -góX8##B%_1zWD %s5]F_=?AQY[{נr$)aןgUU7wq⑈4gHpH_1>xSQzA'  ^iNu}& .ץZGhd&$}&'b2x/HX<- 1\^7Y[b_QJ=M'2v*ƒĠ*WMTv&[4qJ=j#ⓓ!i#Rr}Mfl {D^GsHC3H fص(8QVⰞ1d 2*Ҹ:u%fv!,-ŝ0>DEJ(<Elg\xF餍kY!Ò d_xb?XQ@nuxLZg'Td֐z \\ws% 1f4Z0ʨ7}cbnb~eg(pC)J-nG$g8St47+>B2u !$AMXɺ^N~lzSU::_I|Jnڤ>3l縤R4?کzc !3@ z Ss@/ ]JQyGn:ơ3zEkKr/Lg!8 'LuȮE6_>́}eđ8D.s*xU\oݟZ t*C߰VG'in#[psOUQѦzE%qlvi1";c~+>C~sDlp+tkalK5ƨgl EGsEtc{[[]s JsIж{6`2ec,z`qQ8#j2jjDgCF#gs, 'S~m|A<[]Ɨ1HOg(*ǔu)9]#'G=*PARe~Z^>bFo\v[M*0 ܞboAq%i]ױ`U# Һb[FKI2x^"1j7Mpjp = 9VU03+b@p3LLEZqPG€:դnԀ| YnUAXm1[?Kc!U0J4kQ Ra)q;؃hURV"KS".n }wUi-d 35$$Б.ZtzGsiV .&XbR1¨MPBjR4_&07qkκ}6RD۽}hd;^mGCCKگޚOxT>`BKV 6~zy=" FEe*.‡bz_+DY~T2cqZ>$AieG)2ӜsS8 1ҭ¡@0G{adyk4Y*/I,ZçSX A^[f(<:m*@b1TqU囯,OQ 9SkR4.mG2mYֺ{;VD'j`Ky] ӱ2F7H+pr\n}kkwF8z9 7{LϽ6zin:( }sdoeE&{ErVÿtKg\Dz(GGhQEuEY#U =,'ڎQEqQ!jbaELHn%&=VexTcq'>植LXN=;V0ǵ?@S)UTIEM V( k2ұ-Rpꔩ!?\WcRM\,ArdGP:UKtA = V%ֳs>Q:br:6(hzQճpJ$k2"XdU{2yů 'aQ}H=Mr{c?*mjv$>cq8pFzEW>@-j*,slJq*Z7(t3}C>%x:({#t:/*?W,&mh6EH£E!׿{-~QEt2{/Z%( ~5)Ot"z( injury. Addressing this subject is Mel Siff, Ph.D., an exercise scientist whose doctorate thesis examined the biomechanics of soft tissues. <br> It has never been shown scientifically or clinically that the periodic imposition of large forces by weight training on the growing body causes damage to the epiphysial plates, says Siff, in his book Facts and Fallacies of Fitness.  It is extremely misleading to focus on the alleged risks of weight training on children when biomechanical research shows that simple daily activities such as running, jumping, striking or catching can impose far greater forces on the musculoskeletal system than very heavy weight training. <br>To illustrate his point, Siff compared the stress of squatting with running.  Suppose that one child rus a few hundred meters a day in some sporting or recreational activities. This can easily involve several thousand foot strikes in which the reaction force imposed on the body can easily exceed 4 times bodyweight with every stride. Now let another child do a typical average weight training session with 3-5 sets of squats (say, with 10 reps, 8, 6 and 4 reps), with bodyweight or more for the last set. That bodyweight is divided betwen the two legs, so that, even taking acceleration into account, the loading per leg is bodyweight or a little more, while the spine is subjected to the full load on the bar. In other words, the legs and spine in controlled squatting are exposed to significantly less force than in running and jumping. Normally, exercises such as squatting will be done no more than twice a week for a total of about 60 repetitions, while the running child will run every day and subject the body to those many thousands of impulsive foot strikes. <br> It does not require much scientific knowledge or computational genius to see that the cumulative loading imposed by simple running activities on the lower extremities and the spine is far greater than the cumulative load of two or three times a week of weight training. Does this now mean that we are justified in recommending that children not be allowed to run, jump, throw or catch because biomechanical research definitely shows that such activities can produce very large forces on many parts of the growing body? <br>It should be obvious then that there is nothing wrong with running and other normal activities of childhood, and therefore no reason to disallow activities of lesser impact, such as carefully structured programs of weight training.<br>Siff also notes that bone density scans have proven that youngsters who do competitive weightlifting (i.e., the snatch and the clean and jerk) have higher bone densities than children who do not use weights, and that clinical research has not shown any correlation between weight training and epiphysial damage. Further, an extensive Russian study on young athletes, published in a book entitled School of Height, concluded t