JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================pK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?y!R0ZElP᳜e crtb"OsS#_Z絸fqnQjn}w3sUybf=r}*冉HR/֗3sX;kYXtJӏ 9?td1tbҔdR#L*z%h=郜0IZ>ʺ /%\$P2tTj Vn*qZw:vod8k`1_R#`q]at]I@EOBpªjz%΋t^l.ɼl9+gO_@>]L!-nt6 GlN,<5 xA]˂GmZ-͒b@ÏjԆm(jJ.#l/N7kZ 澑H5&{Ya׃Oc_=KMk:Hhe{ UZ!1Tol/d5 C>ihyҾy┹Y2GV/{2IZqilT'#$k޺m{V ߇뻧{HG?3]G5YhhYX&W9j3[r,q߼mֻvyT4񪶚W.9'c֭GgY+isGFpl!4Pnue-zW<6jYBe$vAOUcU xvUV7ֹfJN ϒQ=+GAզε hǘz0v¸xb_KͳBOF=?JpQF; UNE, ؄r2Dte'sX rݪ"yɯZ8zil|[Cf 譎S#c񬝍~ؠgb*8, H_ۥfnr<ct5 C#,[ɭ/6n,Wq\UqμQޠO ȪFY_qF=+{Q݅YkO'v] I^oQF= l\r}* KOR{ҙ^OsYSkWsy yVTRl0y[Iz'=)go֠kѬ֦~꽮:R璍oG0'H1Xv.$fu9h9+Lt o2AsLu؁y؈ޒ $)!Vʨ#neRp8uQrf}5%ЊiUPd Z!sZr }Mz5k<wBNe$` Q'+­bOErVU[Put,-e 9ckfH Ζ04=4eIKry㿒9#ڲFW\V]2TTGsvV&w$Bj#m:3 î+NMI ]A V}V9HqWL1 c*<br>Take a look at Rob Riti and Darwin Walker who are featured in this journal. Next year when they are with an NFL team, would you demand that Rob try to get a 1,100-pound Squat or Darwin get a 600-pound Bench. No! These men are strong enough. A different focus should come into play.<br><br>Bottom Line: <br>High schools or colleges should never copy exactly a pro team's strength and conditioning program. The difference between these levels is staggering.<br><br>Best For Colleges: The vast majority of Division I colleges do something very similar to the BFS program. All the programs featured in this journal are quite similar. However, there are some major differences between Division I colleges and high schools.<br>One organizational difference is the many two and three-sport athletes at the high school level. Many athletes are always in an in-season training cycle. This throws college periodization programs into an unmanageable situation. The primary in-season goal for a college program is to maintain. Should a 16-year old three-sport athlete always be in a maintenance cycle? Of course not! This would be absurd.<br>What if a Divisi