JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================`K" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?F.i*80j9d-+Qܚ6 .Pg*szzzZj-"sxL~5l TWgx yy Lr-PFų隕8r5";b*sENd@}jAng;;C%1S Uw`8Hc]]V=9sR uķi& 0B@sAf==p+nŤ0u#Z+i uh- Idc+;*k4^+hYRO{1qk)> veggǘsԁTKɡK5D9V58=&ެRZ\8<`ʬ^DR8Z*tyuge)V)kڕmUԐ2rq)WzC7^.`tr}fIC ;$0WUkz591w(q\;VcH H2GWҮ*L0Kf$ry))J90wE J[[U),}Al 2?M.PG0NG\lj/%cT(0iѥ'GEDWw1 ky΀zz!b;t5^m9 ?JF )E"xYo6;|##֢ M䞹Ps][^vأ袵:bGTj15«Tn4POB8˨#ֹ-F8/R7;'ֶixPγةcxn湺kkhت%\g5嫓PFsovb7dqTe!4' 4Tfm#I.7|9ϷVQRHcVi\kIHͻKRi95K&l&-nw=zل U|_Ƶr}A$\/ZBrѐ|8y]L+,Lʱs:J: ʫ"&6X7 fCI9By9\^6zå͸Gd}릜ޤG3s>uv1KmI8Ud9Q`ީY#%fXƻyVӹidxoZ+#J[˽7mٟ1Q25Mv4NzT靃_֩;$Fx 沂W92ab8۸dWC]m-:{W/:dzs]Fgΐ ʋ13k.7ko^ݠۼǿ\~ yDI.WQji#p9s57i2~nk&ܬ}'KIșj`f2Ī @ZQBpkYY!epNօ;n 1gJբT'.: 5xTk=ҭ IA9r{0SѶ\*?NBk2V˖=Lm%Sz?f the students (48%) were in favor of testing everyone in the school instead of testing certain groups (12%) or not testing at all. 20% said that testing would be an invasion of their rights and what they did on their own time was not the school s business.<br><br>Parental Input<br><br>Informal parental discussion appears to favor drug testing. Their main concern is awareness of procedures. They also showed concern about why all students were not tested. This could be done in the form of a letter, to the parents, or in a parent meeting without the general public. This meeting should be used to explain all aspects of the testing. Parents said that the more they know, about the testing procedures, the less anxious they are about it.<br>What if?<br><br>What if someone in our school were to test positive? If the test were negative, there would be no further action taken. If a student tests positive, he or she is suspended from athletics, for a certain amount of time, parents are notified and counseled, the student pays for another drug test and independent counseling with personal funds. School funds