JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================EK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?jOY(_5M]?sѻimQ#i=J^YCe+*&S2yq`~WKנV>KP6$yp{U٥-&Lʗ`Gq]PcWXRRg$sxb_W'\n[(l.c? 9>u-)$.)mǦ2hNJBs">:bVmHu)j9 )xf)' hNV8\E_J{ Y]a@K[A)Xǐ9+ЮO5RzGKf;)G$E]!*{t eiea…'~5Q/q]\499)[{{hSx⿴@LNzK_\IXZP `N@ZI++j Z'3Y {$)޴-'l2{FLŽ`,8?{XMqc4Cu,beҴc@ dn'cfc +W+kb6*a1n#=sҫIpEIXˍ.+X%R{O[R}ŽԥmJlޝ;[lʧk]v'- m$kjB ZZ. XOz&3޶RVMFI+&2Kes&05T,,rP fRx WWFԛ'"kO6qwHMBFMm;CRKf4H<qڞmq<,e~^+l١4i|ۏ!}+*IǪ쏄 FzqYƂO$2j"G z V iH}+v.]F;NH{W_0͇ ?V@vxWS B5,*L+)A@A?QH #БX:KuOKმPɴ*\ xzS\CYvZ(23G?ҋ<sEã f?Zn:%zg}RʣQOYE֜eVQԊm nؓPVEA׹?һ(s#trܥwzfs*=OҬw[؄eܞ:w.$)hc黵Ld\] &13s,Wlʒ)`^Ӵ;~W=H;jr+Qmo"hHg:jm~tRBN9UY^$[Ub>n}}*Z+.Hrra\v=reĂvbYr8jIg[kˇV@-,GvFY ^1TkVZt"-X'?G(ԆGmRRncy5KO߽#=jkd[; ;zxṞZ͍8SZQц. tӷdNK`y5ZV5F "K Y=}k'Z[8f5˃9+!qKx W$LzncCش/,S'V=KgiabpW2x$RS]E(}QJ7c\dԱX5;Ͻf]]YoqQIckcklf\X8BsՕ6Keyem13I0$ RcΣ&VwI9&uSF pCV$R="!85}g+O'ՙBhzP})s;O fat. Hydrostatic or underwater weighing is one popular method which is considered accurate. The problem with this method is the cost. It certainly is not practical for high schools or most colleges. Other disadvantages of this system is the hassle of stripping down and submerging yourself in a tank. It is also difficult to administer and takes about 10 minutes to test.<br><br>DEXA is another accurate way to test body fat. I had this done on myself to compare the DEXA results with the hydrostatic method and the new Tanita Analy