JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================]K" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?E_V%O3f%U=SPJ !K-s2ΝsO@f8We}JIRF6ŏ1=5隄IZMws։.m{S黟ʹ[lpI=rx+pv=jՖB :^unn+pkjk{Y7e9)?^jV:D惆PܒQBf:Ofөf0<̮ۗY;y 9PMZ&d>5[ j*<N674s 8]Kie'8Zva]Gse?i:Tp oZ6֤M'+D}q=5Yn3 ޳u{ֵDӪg]jIsiwO:6šŬr\2sDgQ+sfwo n;V-,HN27dU-,[ Ǖ>YoFAf'*GQsN3Dև;sGx7[}kM.Os\烴}),^y7qWE{54涹)7%p}S0-Yԩa=y" j-Ѹ8RrG3]`@bpG2xlZg/i@% gkҴ]Ղ I#GYi$,rй~f527VkgJ콾R%: +d?C⛋GC y$&_x`3\z։˽e ]zV̼HnPzҭToFt"@mA#!` ާxhiˎc9\"uhMiXp}3=E!]u}O ~56k qr韗wLv*!mˈѫ.M6 CQ5YDf=yǥt7̷h`Mc^IQ,Bȼ8lZx]۽"i0MXt!G\.בm"_L ÞxW5mdVܥ8͌CV);NImtiwk)3}렍b1>I!o \e?(hһC4e.6>>b!5߫8*d8ψvb->4'!Hϭqk7.q\{kX| Hzs H!Wny$p@½'F$.v8#=9l&hjͶÖYK @V#x^#n6gW[J$wBFVGAw6zƺ.# #u ּ=bo|QHfBOR\l|>Om}eǮAE#O,&=OkJqo$D|ԃ<br>Bottom Line: <br>High schools or colleges should never copy exactly a pro team's strength and conditioning program. The difference between these levels is staggering.<br><br>Best For Colleges: The vast majority of Division I colleges do something very similar to the BFS program. All the programs featured in this journal are quite similar. However, there are some major differences between Division I colleges and high schools.<br>One organizational difference is the many two and three-sport athletes at the high school level. Many athletes are always in an in-season training cycle. This throws college periodization programs into an unmanageable situation. The primary in-season goal for a college program is to maintain. Should a 16-year old three-sport athlete always be in a maintenance cycle? Of course not! This would be absurd.<br>What if a Division I athlete misses a workout?