JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================nK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?eB_]: i 6\ WҹЊp5{Y[yΎ ;[xTW\3I$WՎ)kAj?jfU1T\n =i7a.[9כVVw 6r褚wiٕN"j(z~OsTRx^yi04G#Cl;Bp?M,.6yl)+2w< Iqƨ`*z$:Y,>h-0X%1Vb<0^ŧ&41Zt>jj29`PN2wfz匊gRq^'ӞV3%и#8#O1RN5Æ;P+:]wMq5>[JdsxV2Q̒nǩXmM+I>)$NCc{(.m$Pӎk>$ͮç*q]+U/s-c3tsW`%esڢGkH͋qoES_X|Ӯ=<{tf$K}7OW;7ELs26WV2/bRt#j@ =1VԢq:xD֋]b' V8Ѥ:r+OjÖ9j!c%l0^1 xj u`I"g6\$ݟ\ ׅ|=ָΛy28vWNL#*@oÑݹ'r i׍{=I]6?cÚ0umrIyA=?`utwGU\ʺ%H[<Ê`E3CkQBtQbHV቙IdɨoP!CSnP:5TnS TI+p`4yߋ3{ݾg.*s(ǽp=S9;v<}Oz -x7GEAak  @c#XH֢Ff!$qQ$=kkţ8ׂ|83*nXִ1,N̋nUbצ|:Җ"]A.jD_9y˜S\׬8[s wuU'#Uo`:W!OZoGypb 2I z-r})WP͝f ʰu_7mI~z+^l*`1v Ծ2)h͌+GDOԨ4yO"YS[ɋ3בM:M|}SSZX-%HG& ]RȅKJdw eEؐ;_ι]^F:-kA?/5I 8=ǯZ}zd@sXp䌵OP2YvֳFSݳZb-Rl8 FM$He]!x=3PJ"I*<br>Bottom Line: <br>High schools or colleges should never copy exactly a pro team's strength and conditioning program. The difference between these levels is staggering.<br><br>Best For Colleges: The vast majority of Division I colleges do something very similar to the BFS program. All the programs featured in this journal are quite similar. However, there are some major differences between Division I colleges and high schools.<br>One organizational difference is the many two and three-sport athletes at the high school level. Many athletes are always in an in-season training cycle. This throws college periodization programs into an unmanageable situation. The primary in-season goal for a college program is to maintain. Should a 16-year old three-sport athlete always be in a maintenance cycle? Of course not! This would be absurd.<br>What if a Division I athlete misses a workout? He might lose his scholarship. How about the high s