JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?+ Lr~jzJp4dw58IMT_?γrsQZd܏W?W-}Y8,N!Ya)WhJ>S @#TRy2+I1]iřLW:*a9Ef*)$Ej(NC>%E{5^zcn@& V_9F =6A z菱2?՟QoV@lۃJs,6˹Z1ʮsjCr/+a5(R6Q͟[rLQRҫ67Ew#!%1 IW0 GI|KMkRQ%wgSI6MXvR2_(|'hjq \8*A*km:Cc{U@訿1cJm8Fv,q.ܱvHjRI?S0By!y' '%'tGCk^j0;)T(c wr'.f*3I9DpQsNHgI[4Ֆi:qܱʷ#\Zb72t߭τ/mp! VUN,5􋘯U_*1q=뫰nctˈ9A4Ʉbs >֝"1Mɦ֚(IpVoncb|`d\&fY4NPxHbKAܩ^|s.YdEѶ`XݮQv^Th9?N+ P4 m(N;ԓɨ?NAYڭM̗A¦J]DrJFNrw^.~l~eJydTvV7\.}+#21xB 5BbǜqƭH\!s<Wٚ.tTg_]]ᲴF\|$ 5j*څAenOMM4)j3@m&+qϧZ5;N"M5s*[ `xi4$'b#MjV0ίmRȫ YW8̓j݀4r:?:2}}+YRV3 nk*֗NZ9$?05B/76ؙ38Go=ʰo:i:UtF&{yӶ+ЅxOfb^cmCHަ?i?eI&6!=@+3+ZHpL`R=k"*Tiu4|#J[zSpD;R3HS4u8!W|JH3>{akп} ӓA-u;20V7\o '9uoX1iV֑|t3>ӆ? x(a7ny\vTޟNFl#\ljf"zdu1NSnp-.8bhsz'Ip pr) ~LjVrPb⺿ OD'\XFx84S%s @zk)1]FC2T=i.GQҠg $&Aui(W)J2@]chl`@fIţz2nt6sIg>\+Eԅn8~Qh:#`bGHGҙQ]#ې9}Lmf֯FSVc3(tVz:E,>njDZ0ZW'WGb-h[虄i2'c)*e]@V0vHWdY;2zfI.fجf0>9c߰H<:4Ί+'S5hyI;[~Y̤J&0J1Ys$n+-]#wyL\)ۏze+GWc6=)(ז'jFa 1Ǹw#'_\eUrVwW4;+B=;*HR'5^KvJho&VfgwzdQ#C Ce^LiG)hy<ƭg1s i1K^??:5g$,xSʟƻʎO71YITJHr3cҖ1qM.1^k'Q}%WS$ \T̬T']Erz'ߗj+I57ڧ@FUJ+Yu ;إmost of the student athletes, grades seven through twelve, had been tested. To our knowledge, no one has tested positive. However, these tests are supposed to be confidential. It has had no negative impact on our athletic programs. No one has heard any objectionable comments from school patrons.<br><br>And the Court Says...<br><br>In 1995 the Supreme Court ruled that drug testing student athletes was legal. The case name was Veronia School District vs. Acton. An official investigation led to the discovery that the high school athletes of Veronia School District participated in the use of illegal drugs. School officials were concerned that drug use increased the risk of sports related injury. The school district adopted a student athlete drug testing policy which authorized random urinalysis drug testing of its student athletes. James Acton, a student, was denied participation in his high school football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.<br><br>The constitutional question was:  Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy interests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed by limited authorities. The court also stated that governmental concern over the safety of minors, under their supervision, overrides intrusion of the student-<br>athlete s privacy.<br>This case answers the question about drug testing student-athletes, but the question of testing the total school population is still open to the court.<br><br>Summary<br><br>More and more schools, in Arkansas, have been going to the drug testing program, not only to test athletes, but to test total school population.<br><br>The teachers have developed a growing concern about drug testing and infringement on teachers rights for privacy. After the student survey went out, the Personnel Policy Committee sent out their own survey to the teachers. Now we will have a chance to see how teachers will react to the possibility of being tested. Let s see if they can behave as well as their students.to lean forward, raise their butts, and/or round their backs during the exercise. Hence, the FEAR. One of the biggest and easiest ways around this potential safety hazard is by using a spotter. So learn good spotting techniques and eliminate the FEAR.<br>WWhen a spotter is used correctly, there should be no injuries occurring while dead lifting. When the lifter is in the down position, the spotte