JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================VK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?,0ܖoZ{X3A}mGE|dI$6g)7L+ ۊxGj|w!kf$NgjZ^GPİ+;W9ͨFP1]A> ֝֕pVž㯺xܺΣ)vLPKuhdPEkxL"t$oZ{+ZXY={QlzYk`ѽ0ǂxڠdzVѬl(A" .8=sTxQ*'mh-?w]$rzc>wr~nxvf 3#lŽpN~VGo|Ou$4,89'QG,pngUfR,J>ed~bb69r:l姯\WjZ[kNn'_z39xQN1:!sOX~P3Z:ψ5m7l㩮XO &#I䱭*,$#Qk9rIMDd+>VF݅WPAk],w}(TW޼9wҪsj+Mǖ?h^\HE\{Q-7E8ݰvյ&I.nI[}&485g^3U yMRaNF:Ȯ+ʹj3jeK6&JZwC# = v/$cT6\`w=vu<kiV+{=M*?SvZ.,ʒ X>B'˄^}+SRz~UjF1r7ûvs{h_jJquujUc9迕xQٰ͢٢\t(6UtaX`9?W3lrl+LW-: ,NXŠ*o\C8Wg ';Lj8Aj6O4$n}?Š+X-)J\ћE ˸yj{zWXuAnԜnOORs1#yyAQ\I?allel Squat takes longer than the Bench Press to complete the same number of sets. Therefore, if you have four squat stations and four bench stations with a system of rotating from one to another you can run into challenges. Your athletes doing the bench get done with their sets before the athletes who are squatting. What do you do? Well, they could stretch, 9B)>qTR\Rۘg$~V Ps`-J mvy&V夠SX#f?~Ag2E<)p,Np=k2=sT Z}XC*`j'I?(ڰ5V(OoJyd ,j ZKGqO&(U4SB0XfN*,M"_L [5|(ѹuV3R`q]>ƝuU9cPќ5m,NAlHs^=?CJI# (U|A bsϥp|ǷzZmdR ZsC =1PXgڐJjqk,0 eQ Z *ݱ؀RV<4?-B]JLK40ష`=j ;Ǩng the same lift. our time management becomes more precise and controlled. The athletes could get more intense if a competitive atmosphere were created with everyone doing the same lift. Finally, in most cases, the one station approach can save space.<br><br>What are the disadvantages, if any? I can think of only two. First, the cost. The transition from one approach to this approach costs money. Some one station-do-it-all pieces can cost $2500.00 or more pr station. Our BFS Ultimate Rack is only $1666 for a heavy duty 7 gauge model that includes a flat to incline bench. A deluxe version, with custom paint, vinyl, etc. is only $150.00 more. Some coaches are converting in stages by getting one or two stations per year. The second disadvantage can lie in the