JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?Z(/+ @Yͭ؃ƙc?ƀ5(4o_ Z++~m?kWhV߱_Gբc?ƀ5h4o_ Z++~-??iWhV߱_Gբc?ƀ5h414E@*Umޔ(q?'3-33Ñkjͻq@Ox_zcygl|o^ t?3@X,&P|/5+}_N@̻>٤qjЛ~oO#$՚mVOVwEo_k n,yvGǀkͧԚfٳ+ M%{嚱k?_C[E4ގva_m5,K;1ػ5Ln;4 JHzw#r.e2J|?3@G+o ;":SMK :pۡ5/qɧg-)>[}9gO9;oOKjWmV?[xgƦѼ])-^6  Ozh̎ }RqwJO+ gAi{Ry>m;or|EO,qI\gǚ?3( '9O %*7"kDj·+/+o ;"ӼO{O\Gj!{DQc&ωϩGc@F@"򇴌o_5I;X ?ȭ4¶+/om^IXÙdVJ|PXGR6 qe+?? v ?ȭ4¶+tdcr}s?pr3@\o7n@yD)'ZI|KM}:)..}tw!+!^fVڽzH+m7Sځcs:{lG)z(B0T.Ҵ*)cvGT#+(e`AGo\1:56=!VJICXm:88Ob+a^=q:AkXTV\J'g鶣lԊ 0pA޾*9 Kx7Άgqlh{\#05au +F׸iO}{s|.ﮚxdбH+8xGMұFia=oVx6U]ӳ&*jS_x|X K$9֨^9"\ ٕ$81k^$^ZDG˺MOG5x'H5XqdHGtFRj| -%H>%kk+3Cd[n4BH* S5^5A+08˃Yvt?E4 v HZr1lu95Trnk[mr@G'Jl#]'^>q$\/@=?C;Qkqe(TǭD14ڊCנ^Q3%U\)%~ZM& .vr@8]w|1#kߖEIphѴrKL| )B抵s^1|<˄>{կ}J8\gյ]Nw|/eXQ_-)tdwsR=b2L! 3G<(j-livRYgu d:U[XJEҬ>(AA%RP7j60$U ;_N?_C_kݛo\Նzm³߽@鵆=+ XK_{4s^nt%4MSQYWm`{.dq+ԑڪ|J|A6si9XI̓T; [ $Ig %Rkb+w淧R9 j#PL/oџ_lt-FQ ,GS-'C,pG~u6mY7r ҭ,UyM?<ٜ/ ۃhNPǁaVP1UmH i?tŠ6Ub4(Zw[ڵ>W#җᏉӘ`j1ZX.^vӗ,ߍ >;H'Ipƥ@y4Σ2XFqWUY Yt(plyF64T (hh(??(*d~j"9@ڼź%Ȗ-WKo/Q;ԯvY#{QeOK6gkl `pӝ}/ɫ%RiD0}[C[;RbBV޷[hTmpݻ^_Eu:sqONzW`~SM{fժrUoAōRwJtԳWctuH⺭>h-Xڅ[ǁTPEVLBEƏƊ(((((9p+60?J֨&ߥqƙ7R+'JV6W )[ֻ\?;b0*I[spStqwF<x/#):$#ڼ֢Gظ*k/ԭBWT\7Yu|bto;9!Us]T>|>\^gegX-"5`Rƭמ|@ w *R$q(UU9K JuF dY6#S-[WCgU'LvM}uQN Dq6ۻ.i`tVW JԉR( (((΀ΏΏΏ΀ΏΏΏ΀ΐT-B zWL^B zP;K"oH%/XhN :è5.eڼIf nM(>z<iG[y*]ƞ(O i_>Khǯ#@^[2]wI-߉gu$ #4ˑ2ҳjs-i]2+ڣUt<[Wd,t5`tH/L(΀ΏΏΏ΀ΏΏΏ΀ΏΏΏ΀Σ7z?:?:ȺVPH]J5Ɓr0plVⵅ5fmJ@ؖ@Ҵ6)cҥ?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:((袀ΏΊ(袀ΏΊ(袀4ҀEG*:_ΏΒΏΊ(袀ΏΊ(袀 (?oh?4H-.aF١2/:}*@Қ&cRHvWÜ8R{tq~[Zuq,X?3`'\ 5%Cj%}cwD~Hj (:O.OznG'1yE<Ҋ ۰F_'4oE=@1) ź܌jaM8H2B)V+}Hy*>F$pN:bJU`V({Ѵ1 9[&D;Ϛ]B&=ɵ$}>IPmcJLgxSҦ!Ҟ6?ofY{:Fs˛&!IFyWz-փNs5%HUQ$1ɡ!\Fr^Tw)+|@avXZQzN? 6:W <ԡJ94E<br>The constitutional question was:  Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy interests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed by limited authorities. The court also stated that governmental concern over the safety of minors, under their supervision, overrides intrusion of the student-<br>athlete s privacy.<br>This case answers the question about drug testing student-athletes, but the question of testing the total school population is still open to the court.<br><br>Summary<br><br>More and more schools, in Arkansas, have been going to the drug testing program, not only to test athletes, but to test total school population.<br><br>The teachers have developed a growing concern about drug testing and infringement on teachers rights for privacy. After the student survey went out, the Personnel Policy Committee sent out their own survey to the teachers. Now we will have a chance to see how teachers will react to the possibility of being tested. Let s see if they can behave as well as their students. James team that also had a 14-0 record.&nbsp; Coach Shepard was on the sidelines with us to witness what might have been the greates