JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================W" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?w3,e##]$x`8#ҝqXdMN5wOIh-txQw PAmb!O @I;mf;xɄ`N0O5c%a #|dH-I:\yld5L/dedTȷFwӯJQb챿 \J*U+O]ZDL8]Bv=:W%՚I ,I?J4i9is@\/GQd99m3Hեx ̠ &.|1|b$ V.-rV )%RCnRCYڲedB[#C&Ƣi dl1Q0y*qڻDho~EL1HDx,]P\IJE8BjTgZm2[I+1=;  rBR@00#ҹY[C7r0;tCB7WjEmlz;mc"6#F~(OC 64cT5Ψ[̨[v=_Z߬. ^y8MtI1Re^Ia^ !y|:fӬ\ q2~?N+OCDIG0ZոgkA*QʰPTEiGhCU+VXH̠[9kqc˧uhcK`wKN$:.-I+9Ajʲ}kSуOKPD)p3Zs[2Mط?ы[4():'XMP zScoD9\ שTY=c2yڬ9PG,`赝8宭:.+jVMsng?+ubuFS%{E&%Grr2rs8̚.{vBL~썧 JߓSx"ExYvETȬgC-Q- 6wN(jZo.xtil@FG5 d";K'CqI\ ]}I\KrhVr]NM+#IP%$vzvMݾ>Zwct2HQIJ'PUTH:q`#I%+ ds\>c5#5KwP6< 1-."Upw*PvR jm.VIX5~\M[OwŤ%TkZf#8GAexO YArd20rkԭxM'1Fſ ZH_'~}5oui2KfpXܓ0jh;Aa8ȟ{upXw(/v sm ustQ3wqӞ2~Jq;;Mm*`2{k+u. .H ҹ[{Y RKHrE{-exn88P09j ؿkfE f}FYT,gbӵƿ!eU (Xx53OssϴK&Ҡq!.֑t{*2nCC:*: Cm;!Dsǵn-uqQ捾t=>ҦHt^8&Vg nSǸrWђ~*Ҵ֊;?vEAz;fif]ǿ{@vs:9u┕ u5=T`wivR{|Yo{smYvr3&_MS@~7\Pܖ@{ 'm5rN4Hq5FIC=5na9bU@ulԫ"\^jWP]-.>U| 1JE 2>ôX֭-DI,6:u_öQFL3Z! _s\3rqմBv w'YT.ptcu[#Kr)j64$`wV0s~i$A= O]HG]E#m\1@uŒ܃VJe8[T(ԓz1O ِJ(2{m'<)Qv}:(6:83=(bo c=SϐQ.d(P\yJ8袗Q%d*5n9pz(& .Jq(f !P 襋t/@}9Mzl-ǧ?u1aOJ]JRd4hB/V4КFf5qsS4ƺR :8aܸn52#xAOҺl1|J-g 22zRjz >wdQb{`QEG&7yߐO\EAdeL%GLvDbW%I'VTHddg>-k34dS[jcAaZ\3Ze(')!Ai@=fOSL %K偏j A֬Q>f%ƑbHY}+oKm-u$M*sRi:yH#s>*yc{+ZAA9^˘e;p}*D8A6-cI.a$֜dqހ&w0l+:OZLrbpZeg`\ʩo_R.YDf A>OCI2'QZ@v?}jo6<Bx w"YhCmdG5̱ 5AE?yQޓq=C'v:VTR#{OZCܓ'jeH3y+8=bz(9Nϥ:q* -17 u$ z~u[fwMn'^9]IY.$L2qLnIrCs!>{귃5Z$&4'agbumՌҶU#WcsZ݌ҹ8.&̄SԻKd#O9j P3J;`F~W҂y~b pHTΝ?'n }) E0ORW;>xb!FI kYC8P:{9DUHG>UxG0r>̣)I΍r#-3 ȈޕcهH6WL$Gzz=1~+M8+\}id :nQp%uKrFjG9d}md1zonE9? Fr]ճEKo*XW.sL$Sgs d$Ĝw#4Q@. u=HΦ0Op3E[jabG`1@åP fړ9$l;'NQ@xy@]$˺F dqE8 }|->V#Fp(B)9c {CYvaY$֊((\D|TFcJۄ$tQ@q4a( ;p8D +*gx|vв"l%vN뚊TX)i9QE,b?wZFȬC1 0H,`,qVQ 0:QENUۘd@?袊juries have been reported. No lost time from trainiarch and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy interests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed by limited authorities. The court also stated that governmental concern over the safety of minors, under their supervision, overrides intrusion of the student-<br>athlete s privacy.<br>This case answers the question about drug testing student-athletes, but the question of testing the total school population is still open to the court.<br><br>Summary<br><br>More and more schools, in Arkansas, have been going to the drug testing program, not only to test athletes, but to test total school population.<br><br>The teachers have developed a growing concern about drug testing and infringement on teachers rights for privacy. After the student survey went out, the Personnel Policy Committee sent out their own survey to the teachers. Now we will have a chance to see how teachers will react to the possibility of being tested. Let s see if they can behave as well as their students.ONG>BISHOP McGUINNESS HIGH SCHOO