JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================qK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?E4k%# 1(pU~ 1ڸrqNԚL;p=^Oҡa\5ޥo lrst˝N=EiQgw1kq^q|L}jO)CTBTC85#)iʭMIwg..zL'@q\u^j34S0+&9Gs̸qs7E*g H3kFMn̘1`Win /֨:4TH ݃Qܐalg D_VhkW2oe*CN{hpR'GC^q S]+^2G#fE,Gj-};2:AQ9ׯ>kE{n9}s^ ɳϼO|,)"-3e|C&ĉrϭmOnҹa&^W"Uс=C]zj\kxo%'a{<\#_wA*AĦ{Dr5 kS͜D5Eyq+&us BIJ;rT$pyzP0<̏ǚHԧW7>oqpcǍ TJ'Mٞ]5u# [=Gj }< d=zW|9u2@ʜgt^dlwHrsߥgR2bRuGppO\Vl~ ~ɟ|ԑxKr*Grǩ<&y,e[g]bQ'LO) -nbb'C !ة3#ouqJ˾׮"u̝tm< ͩ΋O]haxE%\xak!Qr8הzΒ$ZQoZM&=/1D;~U*@E2d] NʡkOsgE]@>ky-=袀$}i8LYΫӆE3 }NIzMgV$lz(e#E+W~t{(QeF?} ?*Nr'O과p2̣= M zxiKAުj^يp Zmjх:FCXZ#l|+ pƕ'SFw41tN m6XLWh?[F?KdN@ Uh8eVrwmh-L*EԮfݿ _)}VviTI@36w>{G1?EqzYݡzhV2g31pFM;5kaVeO=q905(s*8֌k8eE-(H]q>*Z *\~k) 4 i gmR$iE}KB( 2蒫 V[ XI]4C9R=+m l:C"hܗI8Ubn$B9>§vՐ zZ NԞOO-c3 E~u,~'\۷qiʝ4iV1\^[M %>^N:}+SQ uKjʬation-do it all concept, there is more efficiency. Your coaching becomes easier ecause everyone is doing the same lift. Your time management becomes more precise and controlled. The athletes could get more intense if a competitive atmosphere were created with everyone doing the same lift. Finaly, in most cases, the one station approach can save space.<br><br>What are the disadvantages, if any? I can think of only two. First, the cost. The transiion from one approach to this approach costs money. Some one station-do-it-all pieces can cost $2500.00 or more per station. Our BFS Ultimate Ra