JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?֍xu.j!7?n¿?pտ? Jo]tU(ͤJ?+S [ TVQYY TV¿?pտ?wQd8WףC븢k ¿?pտ?O5o]{YC~z(,pO5oG+S [q\ۅuE$l z),Q~z?_8jߟ^( #~z?_8jߟ^( ?+S [ TVQGX_8jߟ^W׮= TV¿?pտ?wQdTá꧸?J' if|̇+WE%RREP BG/ x[KEtO %7 %7ⳭF8-QY )N1k[(e*+2FI@AJZ;_XY٤)^G޾((4(FA7VgN;ւV-?߆#=?S_)M3Lŝسܞh[sgc_]ʫ QW+?  i{d')V ^q #U$zzU&(?mec#$-By{q]]PѬ-.g`C:.֯EP BG/ x[KEtO %7 %7ⳭF8-QY >'(orxW=C^ .92񧏢i]WH''Wt/)pX1ybo۷}wI47WsUTyYF>ѵ-{NNfpñkB|5ENTy1F77s֠)(h8Ay|xmy"i]I#Hؐ0\o7=c_, B2~,H澪EΛ2vEWRsA_9xJhFU 'Wc@-c4QEB$Q B]+Do5 M+o5 M+; EVC彻np}@PREQEp-o -|B$WJ=D[ _SJ+[ _SJ+:cEƲB2iźD|~>$4Aalg=:6U8S gFBal1cO{=2:Z)(Gos\!R}2[I$y"mbV?qE} s~ #|eV0A_9Q@xᴱ<H|9緵l\߃_8ս7M⳱TQ@Fi=_Egbs\JUݫ3|pjSM]QEQEp-o -|B$WJ=D[ _SJ+<Cm+mmBW WW ¦$=a_Q ²s;~cЌW]|vckG Wm X~ſ{9 >\+uhSlp>YPI8/  4K0L [G,? b =рZa_Q g>tt—q|)@;_ ŸM;1o/A(s ŸM_|+sfom+ yǦj,? b ?a_Q.tW7 X~ſ{9 X~ſ-_ϰ]%-_1o}!o IhxHu G_Er(QWrј>bX6U<74?r7ӎkGQbm.Dlp ޼ VQ𑃴s5Th{DCz7m8mUN]MF`G{R5"*zU5}vf5"(kDEVs>f5"(kDEVs>f5"(kDEVs>f5"(kDEVs>f5"(kDEVs>f"H$NUPqEiQG3 \.mQ"3X024ؖ}s䓞xHUw-$wo:BHʶs:/ Ab4K9q 8K9|hsKSu"S?#VfMi|xX mRֹ'V'y\\}FRL+Jm:ԼmˑL ܢ1oji{Ҵn61cV5-O6Wʑ1c'=i@#/&m=J(((((((ٳ^ZM`ږ";SVs𿉵%-V{FTIxƚUzOEg:JrAvoʲ$kMQ]ˠ*wP}Uk֗>-{-Llӿi~m='Ͻ(:[n}k?t?EAh7 @ni: r1I B"֞2h,})2{FzW}Q֞1`4֐?ҨhC0UG>@'&d"*FY)JYPDCP;JaM*̞7'5#rt?j8SbS}g"IWYY$S!Gz 枥Z7'vĒJ/I(.MM!zP):zӲ=M;53VP XBONdPLKh`;4!< ;&'ւOƓ'փ֔i^) 3XQWSsn?ܮiyx1MTMBO$FƵ9NJ!QDp?:=? =AlgJNiO?U/Z]i;0AO4=M!CRSB Թ @Iފts from school patrons.<br><br>And the Court Says...<br><br>In 1995 the Supreme Court ruled that drug testing stuent athletes was legal. The case name was Veronia School District vs. Acton. An official investigation led to the discovery that the high school athletes of Veronia School District participated in the use of illegal drugs. School officials were concerned that drug use increased the risk of sports related injury. The school distric adopted a student athlete drug testing policy which authorized random urinalysis drug testing of its student athletes. James Acton, a student, was denied participation in his high school football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.<br><br>The constitutional question was:  Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy interests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed by limited authorities. The court also stated that governmental concern over the safety of minors, under their supervision, overrides intrusion of the student-<br>athlete s privacy.<br>This case answers the question about drug testing student-athletes, but the question of testing the total school population is still open to the court.<br><br>Summary<br><br>More and more schools, in Arkansas, have been going to the drug testing program, not only to test athletes, but to test total school population.<br><br>The teachers have developed a growing concern about drug testing and infringement on teachers rights for privacy. After the student survey went out, the Personnel Policy Committee sent out their own survey to the teachers. Now we will have a chance to see how teachers will react to the possibility of being tested. Let s see if they can behave as well as their students. on the last set depending on the core lift.<br><br>You will notice the rep records go to only 5 reps on the Clean and the Dead Lift. Doing extra reps on these two lifts could cause an injury especially to he lower back. As fatigue sets in, chance for muscle spasms and incorrect lifting techniques