JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?_Zq:1]*/Z~ȋvBںkUIª%WZUZ_ WoEewª%WZUZ_ WoEڧp8UZ_ Q K_jTG K_j?Ui+]{j?Ui+G*/ZmSYG*/ZUKWvQw #UKW𪴿 j֮ފ=Ndq𪴿 j֣VA-_G,#VA-_ª%WZz(;ª%WZUZ_ WoEڧp8UZ_ Q K_j!iB1v¨=>*ï],oqmU!G,w𽝍=Q-Fs= ChAqsl";TdU<*Wy&T΂Eր>^/>k)LRxֺ(+ʵωڏIGsѾg*OG~+c4nﱤar= Gj.=>s;*y^cvsҀCPHQp=ռ/>;]I/Lq÷)x9ՏhkA ϒQZ] 9d4cs>v;+z >D3ǁw',t#ft7.1MoA=u~c-oE5x9Gbpk~\麎p"Xa=?uv. 4|^Whއc+G4L 4{[D׊E`6ʳ ~WWc53s"+>+(*9_Nů.9RofBc#VfOaI죒!YSM$rʼn$CF Ljod`e*/Ǔc|kt|E; ChK 39n/OaUWDX봟v_-l-QYJj6zEWGoo; o dUk˹A\ oǷ4wtjg+ifn@aI+-,వK{HRcH`(K$Iid~5-y_/jӴrujJeKohRO|ɎQ|?0fa׾yixN}5;Ju}h|;o PCpS?(asC ȲFk+ =(ľ&m8v?q5U~<[j xz&ݼ$|'?KCmlK 8ST H iU=UE7F\W5Ҽ+`ߖiЄON{z{۶76젓][ qr?Viga˩.6JY}ᝥQ.բZӿ%ӿ%,/帿EIWEi|ۅhq'\?aUz凇W׫@;Izr#!MmOc#pRy Tm7@g* QbsָYvfp$NZ?kMΞ]ĽY.ՏzJ-uivy~s>tKEs""AɵrUx^EK[;ylg^"mĭ*veľS'+5}z$?~t]%RSMOF^\8va{NQG8=:bZU޵c\Jp?>3xJYg[ ~Tzǁ<9l0@(K sķ7VmؒI~Rj-;ޡVݺ7lc Y =φ<=sbYGlqz?d7 :W-Zssm"" cUFT`)uCг5ggw;z+, G,g\j=ފ?d? :Q !Y?c>sYBιuϰ\#Cг5s3;z+, G,g\j=ފ?d? :Q !Y?c>srn4V'YBιuϰ\ _he/M5KCг5s3EV^-G+/ o_s, G`.²mѼ'x~gJⶑeHd? :Q !Y?c>t/OiX,%ϊm, ^)Kl@g=>Wv܅KZü,v6,v$JuZ֞4 ą0=+nfv#bӖ)  N1|g#֠9: >MLcb@8^^/=`R֑j'L]Tþk)j7\Ex; 4t?9l7~6n|Ȓdi%ק,JJ2ЋmkVqITcVn:IMݤT[L6vG0 IKo +Y,.l"_@֜R!IJo'¾%\w6p8~ֽԐ]]O[xGcIA7|EEr(f{:bwMU#,w|WEZ#oeL~x]fѻ9RL Xg)| il-?waw.*Ek-Q@(((((١i>WVv-V[H)Slv[.\h vLs#i:+g0 ȶr4T5$zkIMN=1O 7]G2v)Y &@Vcj] A#2GWL)ghU[iUЯ78nYa1:i9^JL Nxt钌Sy,snM Im$v&BQ'Gm:تT#&񑜐;)Ï(tYGP>c R_'|dZJ7PHmj0a?«IU<2GZc9x~XG~7JԮґ!2-݈b)D.Udh,Ms+ "A<|.-m`B`pR\$!;dSv.TZ4hd]J|ۑ2"Oӭt]@}(V2㯥Im+y ] *(żs(aWҚ{SwFeݾu >D66ItߟX#UWGq(/YDH|dƭϨnnHy$}.2zҕJC#[]V[H5mΨ22OS`$==jO4#o#,rqSE-4;8t C`u?Z)K8ƊUe Court Says...<br><br>In 1995 the Supreme Court ruled that drug testing student athletes was legal. The case name was Veronia School District vs. Acton. An official investigation led to the discovery that the high school athletes of Veronia School District participated in the use of illegal drugs. School officials were concerned that drug use increased the risk of sports related injury. The school district adopted a student athlete drug testing policy which authorized random urinalysis drug testing of its student athletes. James Acton, a student, was denied participation in his high school football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.<br><br>The constitutional question was:  oes random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment? The conclusion by the court was that it did not violate these rights. In the case of high school athletes, under the state s supervision, during school hours, they are subject to greater control than other free adults. The privacy inteests comprised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed by limited authorities. The court also stated that governmental concern over the safety of minors, under their supervision, overrides intrusion of the student-<br>athlete s privacy.<br>This case answers the question about drug testing student-athletes, but the question of testing the total school population is still open to the court.<br><br>Summary<br><br>More and more schools, in Arkansas, have been going to the drug testing program, not only to test athletes, but to test total school population.<br><br>The teachers have developed a growing concern about drug testing and infringement on teachers rights for privacy. After the student survey went out, the Personnel Policy Committee sent out their own survey to the teachers. Now we will have a chance to see how teachers will react to the possibility of being tested. Let s see if they can behave as well as their students.ɡbg0'Tm+jԊ"c#3Ǯ(. (sw$q0G;BJ{PP ݀=JnϩE[pa8(gDBLn8\|d'#9ݻju#PcژK*O(+͊(n9ڛ56"5 fL)r!H'' .QL2+XPi\[LDA>4$Wy*:zTc'n9cҧ1*A I>ʻbA8$= R}Uu籨1nƣL#{)y2}GQBv:qMb1>